autoconf-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 27-autoscan-acheaders.patch


From: Pavel Roskin
Subject: Re: 27-autoscan-acheaders.patch
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 13:52:40 -0500 (EST)

Hello, Akim!

> Index: ChangeLog
> from  Akim Demaille  <address@hidden>
>       * autoscan.pl (@kinds, %generic_macro): New.
>       (&init_tables): Use them.
>       * acheaders: Run `autoconf -t AC_CHECK_HEADERS:'$1'' on the fileutils,
>       and include all these headers in here.

Maybe I have missed something in other posts, but I don't quite understand
the reason. You want to distinguish between system and local headers,
right?

>       Don't specify `AC_CHECK_HEADERS' as it's the default.

We probably need another notation to ignore a header, for example
config.h. Or you mean that all unlisted headers are ignored?

The patch is Ok is you answer "yes" to both questions.

> +mach/mach.h

I guess all sys/*, mach/*, netinet/* headers should match.

> +malloc.h +memory.h +mntent.h +mnttab.h +netdb.h +netinet/in.h
> +nl_types.h +nlist.h +paths.h +sgtty.h +shadow.h +stddef.h
> +stdio_ext.h +stdlib.h +string.h +strings.h +sys/acl.h +sys/file.h
> +sys/filsys.h +sys/fs/s5param.h +sys/fs_types.h +sys/fstyp.h
> +sys/ioctl.h +sys/mntent.h +sys/mount.h +sys/param.h +sys/socket.h
> +sys/statfs.h +sys/statvfs.h +sys/systeminfo.h +sys/time.h
> +sys/timeb.h +sys/vfs.h +sys/wait.h +sys/window.h +syslog.h +termio.h
> +termios.h +unistd.h +utime.h +utmp.h +utmpx.h +values.h +wchar.h
> +wctype.h Index: autoscan.pl --- autoscan.pl Tue, 23 Jan 2001 21:28:15
> +0100 akim (ace/13_autoscan.p 1.28 664) +++ autoscan.pl Tue, 23 Jan
> 2001 21:43:36 +0100 akim (ace/13_autoscan.p 1.28 664) @@ -42,6 +42,20
> @@
>  %programs_macros = ();
>  %needed_macros = ();
>
> -unistd.h     AC_CHECK_HEADERS
> +# Others, to checked with AC_CHECK_HEADERS.

Others, also checked with AC_CHECK_HEADERS.

Akim, you have my Ok for your future autoscan changes, provided that the
patches are published. I want that we finish doing any non-bug related
modification as soon as possible, but I don't want to discard what you
have already done.

Regards,
Pavel Roskin




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]