Re: Expanded rules for scripts

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Dec 14, 2000, Akim Demaille <address@hidden> wrote:

> My understanding was that not all Make support

> .sh:
>         # do foo out of foo.sh

> properly, i.e., implicit rules with destination having no suffix.

I've never found a `make' that doesn't support it, but some recent
versions of FreeBSD make have a bug in which the order of entries in
.SUFFIXES affects its ability to process some suffix rules.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  address@hidden, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        address@hidden, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me