[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More verbose AC_TRY_RUN
|
From: |
Akim Demaille |
|
Subject: |
Re: More verbose AC_TRY_RUN |
|
Date: |
16 Nov 2000 19:02:22 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands) |
-if AC_TRY_EVAL(ac_link) &&
- test -s conftest$ac_exeext && (./conftest$ac_exeext; exit) 2>/dev/null; then
+AC_TRY_EVAL(ac_link) &&
+ (./conftest$ac_exeext) >&AS_MESSAGE_LOG_FD 2>&1;
Yep, it is on purpose there is no longer the test -s, methinks the
shell will have a fine message stating that conftest is either missing
or dead broken, while before `test' would have failed silently, and
the log would have contained no hint of the cause of the failure.