[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Overflow protection in _AC_COMPUTE_INT_COMPILE
From: |
Lars J. Aas |
Subject: |
Re: Overflow protection in _AC_COMPUTE_INT_COMPILE |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Nov 2000 16:29:41 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 10:17:28AM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
: > | +test "x$ac_try" = x && \
: >
: > Please, don't `\'.
:
: I just wanted not to exceed 80 characters. What is your favorite way of
: doing it? dnl?
The \ is unnecessary - the shell will scan the consecutive lines until a
new command is found when you &&.
Lars J
- Overflow protection in _AC_COMPUTE_INT_COMPILE, Pavel Roskin, 2000/11/15
- Re: Overflow protection in _AC_COMPUTE_INT_COMPILE, Akim Demaille, 2000/11/15
- Re: Overflow protection in _AC_COMPUTE_INT_COMPILE, Pavel Roskin, 2000/11/15
- Re: Overflow protection in _AC_COMPUTE_INT_COMPILE,
Lars J. Aas <=
- Re: Overflow protection in _AC_COMPUTE_INT_COMPILE, Akim Demaille, 2000/11/15
- Re: Overflow protection in _AC_COMPUTE_INT_COMPILE, Pavel Roskin, 2000/11/15
- Re: Overflow protection in _AC_COMPUTE_INT_COMPILE, Akim Demaille, 2000/11/15
- Re: Overflow protection in _AC_COMPUTE_INT_COMPILE, Pavel Roskin, 2000/11/15
- Re: Overflow protection in _AC_COMPUTE_INT_COMPILE, Akim Demaille, 2000/11/15
- Re: Overflow protection in _AC_COMPUTE_INT_COMPILE, Alexandre Oliva, 2000/11/15
- Re: Overflow protection in _AC_COMPUTE_INT_COMPILE, Pavel Roskin, 2000/11/16
- Re: Overflow protection in _AC_COMPUTE_INT_COMPILE, Alexandre Oliva, 2000/11/16