[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 18-bugs.patch
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: 18-bugs.patch |
Date: |
13 Nov 2000 19:58:47 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands) |
>>>>> "Pavel" == Pavel Roskin <address@hidden> writes:
Pavel> Ok, the endless loop in _AC_COMPUTE_INT_COMPILE is the only bug
Pavel> I meant.
What is the architecture? I don't remember. I don't remember whether
we used the `int foo[-1]' trick, or the `case 0: case 0:' one. Did
you try whether the other works?
Pavel> The solution would involve eighter another "exit 77" that I
Pavel> hate (but maybe I'll have) to do or changing AT_CHECK to accept
Pavel> multiple combinations of (STATUS, STDOUT, STDERR), which is
Pavel> damn hard to do.
Yes. I still don't understand what's wrong with exit 77. configure
has two exit status values: 0 and non 0.
>> BTW, when you update this file, could you add words like ``please,
>> don't register known bugs to GNATS''?
Pavel> Do it yourself. I see nothing wrong in registering known bugs
Pavel> in GNATS, but you may have reasons.
Additional useless workload.