Index: ChangeLog
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/autoconf/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 1.897
diff -u -r1.897 ChangeLog
--- ChangeLog	2000/10/05 13:52:41	1.897
+++ ChangeLog	2000/10/11 10:05:54
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+2000-10-11  Morten Eriksen <address@hidden>
+
+	* acgeneral.m4 (AC_RUN_IFELSE): Add missing executable suffix.
+	* aclang.m4 (_AC_LANG_COMPILER_WORKS): Likewise.
+	* aclang.m4 (AC_PROG_CC_C_O, AC_PROG_F77_C_O): Fix typos where
+	$objext were used instead of $ac_objext.
+
 2000-10-05  Akim Demaille  <address@hidden>
 
 	Check that updated scripts are valid scripts.
Index: acgeneral.m4
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/autoconf/acgeneral.m4,v
retrieving revision 1.563
diff -u -r1.563 acgeneral.m4
--- acgeneral.m4	2000/10/02 13:11:28	1.563
+++ acgeneral.m4	2000/10/11 10:00:24
@@ -3455,7 +3455,7 @@
 [AC_LANG_COMPILER_REQUIRE()dnl
 m4_ifvanl([$1], [AC_LANG_CONFTEST([$1])])dnl
 if AC_TRY_EVAL(ac_link) &&
-   test -s conftest$ac_exeext && (./conftest; exit) 2>/dev/null; then
+   test -s conftest$ac_exeext && (./conftest$ac_exeext; exit) 2>/dev/null; then
   m4_default([$2], :)
 else
   echo "configure: failed program was:" >&AC_FD_LOG
Index: aclang.m4
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/autoconf/aclang.m4,v
retrieving revision 1.68
diff -u -r1.68 aclang.m4
--- aclang.m4	2000/10/02 13:11:28	1.68
+++ aclang.m4	2000/10/11 10:00:24
@@ -523,7 +520,7 @@
 [# FIXME: these cross compiler hacks should be removed for autoconf 3.0
 # If not cross compiling, check that we can run a simple program.
 if test "$cross_compiling" != yes; then
-  if AC_TRY_COMMAND(./conftest); then
+  if AC_TRY_COMMAND(./conftest$ac_exeext); then
     cross_compiling=no
   else
     if test "$cross_compiling" = maybe; then
@@ -796,9 +793,9 @@
 # Make sure it works both with $CC and with simple cc.
 # We do the test twice because some compilers refuse to overwrite an
 # existing .o file with -o, though they will create one.
-ac_try='${CC-cc} -c conftest.$ac_ext -o conftest.$objext >&AC_FD_LOG'
+ac_try='${CC-cc} -c conftest.$ac_ext -o conftest.$ac_objext >&AC_FD_LOG'
 if AC_TRY_EVAL(ac_try) &&
-   test -f conftest.$objext && AC_TRY_EVAL(ac_try);
+   test -f conftest.$ac_objext && AC_TRY_EVAL(ac_try);
 then
   eval ac_cv_prog_cc_${ac_cc}_c_o=yes
   if test "x$CC" != xcc; then
@@ -806,7 +803,7 @@
     if AC_TRY_COMMAND(cc -c conftest.$ac_ext >&AC_FD_LOG); then
       ac_try='cc -c conftest.$ac_ext -o conftest.$ac_objext >&AC_FD_LOG'
       if AC_TRY_EVAL(ac_try) &&
-	 test -f conftest.$objext && AC_TRY_EVAL(ac_try);
+	 test -f conftest.$ac_objext && AC_TRY_EVAL(ac_try);
       then
         # cc works too.
         :
@@ -1089,8 +1086,8 @@
 # We do the `AC_TRY_EVAL' test twice because some compilers refuse to
 # overwrite an existing `.o' file with `-o', although they will create
 # one.
-ac_try='$F77 $FFLAGS -c conftest.$ac_ext -o conftest.$objext >&AC_FD_LOG'
-if AC_TRY_EVAL(ac_try) && test -f conftest.$objext && AC_TRY_EVAL(ac_try); then
+ac_try='$F77 $FFLAGS -c conftest.$ac_ext -o conftest.$ac_objext >&AC_FD_LOG'
+if AC_TRY_EVAL(ac_try) && test -f conftest.$ac_objext && AC_TRY_EVAL(ac_try); then
   ac_cv_prog_f77_c_o=yes
 else
   ac_cv_prog_f77_c_o=no