[SCM] GNU Autoconf source repository branch, master, updated. v2.68-91-gcff03ec

[Stefano Lattarini]

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "GNU Autoconf source repository".

http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=autoconf.git;a=commitdiff;h=cff03ec71f3a2822284d59cac01a7695a8e7fdfa

The branch, master has been updated
       via  cff03ec71f3a2822284d59cac01a7695a8e7fdfa (commit)
      from  f37c5e315c1e096c1d203de889f209f0d13bbe91 (commit)

Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have
not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those
revisions in full, below.

- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
commit cff03ec71f3a2822284d59cac01a7695a8e7fdfa
Author: Stefano Lattarini <address@hidden>
Date:   Tue Sep 13 16:22:05 2011 +0200

    docs: signal-related bugs and incompatibilities for the shells
    
    * doc/autoconf.texi (Signal handling): New paragraph.
    (@menu at "Portable Shell", @detailmenu): Update.
    
    Motivated by recent discussion on the bug-autoconf list, as well
    as work in the automake testsuite:
     <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-autoconf/2011-09/msg00003.html>
     <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-autoconf/2011-09/msg00004.html>
     <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2011-09/msg00066.html>

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary of changes:
 ChangeLog         |   11 ++++++
 doc/autoconf.texi |   93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 1c46341..b780d30 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+2011-09-13  Stefano Lattarini  <address@hidden>
+
+       docs: signal-related bugs and incompatibilities for the shells
+       Motivated by recent discussion on the bug-autoconf list, as well
+       as work in the automake testsuite:
+        <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-autoconf/2011-09/msg00003.html>
+        <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-autoconf/2011-09/msg00004.html>
+        
<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2011-09/msg00066.html>
+       * doc/autoconf.texi (Signal handling): New paragraph.
+       (@menu at "Portable Shell", @detailmenu): Update.
+
 2011-09-19  Eric Blake  <address@hidden>
 
        docs: refer to correct AC_RUN_IFELSE parameter name
diff --git a/doc/autoconf.texi b/doc/autoconf.texi
index 86e28f0..db414cf 100644
--- a/doc/autoconf.texi
+++ b/doc/autoconf.texi
@@ -509,6 +509,7 @@ Portable Shell Programming
 * Shellology::                  A zoology of shells
 * Here-Documents::              Quirks and tricks
 * File Descriptors::            FDs and redirections
+* Signal handling::             Shells, signals, and headaches
 * File System Conventions::     File names
 * Shell Pattern Matching::      Pattern matching
 * Shell Substitutions::         Variable and command expansions
@@ -15072,6 +15073,7 @@ subset described above, is fairly portable nowadays.  
Also please see
 * Shellology::                  A zoology of shells
 * Here-Documents::              Quirks and tricks
 * File Descriptors::            FDs and redirections
+* Signal handling::             Shells, signals, and headaches
 * File System Conventions::     File names
 * Shell Pattern Matching::      Pattern matching
 * Shell Substitutions::         Variable and command expansions
@@ -15523,6 +15525,97 @@ ksh[1]: exec: 10: not found
 127
 @end example
 
address@hidden 
<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-autoconf/2011-09/msg00004.html>
address@hidden Signal handling
address@hidden Signal handling
address@hidden Signal handling in the shell
address@hidden Signals, shells and
+
+Portable handling of signals within the shell is another major source of
+headaches.  This is worsened by the fact that various different, mutually
+incompatible approaches are possible in this area, each with its
+distinctive merits and demerits.  A detailed description of these possible
+approaches, as well as of their the pros and cons, can be found in
address@hidden://www.cons.org/cracauer/sigint.html, this article}.
+
+Solaris 10 @command{/bin/sh} automatically traps most signals by default;
address@hidden See: 
<http://dbaspot.com/shell/396118-bourne-shell-exit-code-term.html>
+the shell still exits with error upon termination by one of those signals,
+but in such a case the exit status might be somewhat unexpected (even if
+allowed by POSIX, strictly speaking):
+
address@hidden
+$ @kbd{bash -c 'kill -1 $$'; echo $?} # Will exit 128 + (signal number).
+Hangup
+129
+$ @kbd{/bin/ksh -c 'kill -15 $$'; echo $?} # Likewise.
+Terminated
+143
+$ @kbd{for sig in 1 2 3 15; do}
+> @kbd{  echo $sig:}
+> @kbd{  /bin/sh -c "kill -$s \$\$"; echo $?}
+> @kbd{done}
+signal 1:
+Hangup
+129
+signal 2:
+208
+signal 3:
+208
+signal 15:
+208
address@hidden example
+
+This gets even worse if one is using the POSIX `wait' interface to get
+details about the shell process terminations: it will result in the shell
+exiting normally, rather than by receiving a signal.
+
address@hidden
+$ @kbd{cat > foo.c <<'END'}
+#include <stdio.h>    /* for printf */
+#include <stdlib.h>   /* for system */
+#include <sys/wait.h> /* for WIF* macros */
+int main(void)
address@hidden
+  int status = system ("kill -15 $$");
+  printf ("Terminated by signal: %s\n",
+          WIFSIGNALED (status) ? "yes" : "no");
+  printf ("Exited normally: %s\n",
+          WIFEXITED (status) ? "yes" : "no");
+  return 0;
address@hidden
+END
address@hidden $$ font-lock
+$ @kbd{cc -o foo foo.c}
+$ @kbd{./a.out} # On GNU/Linux
+Terminated by signal: no
+Exited normally: yes
+$ @kbd{./a.out} # On Solaris 10
+Terminated by signal: yes
+Exited normally: no
address@hidden example
+
+Some shells seem to handle @code{SIGQUIT} specially: they ignore it even
+if it is not blocked, and even if the shell is not running interactively
+(in fact, even if the shell has no attached tty); among these shells
+are at least Bash (from version 2 onwards), Zsh 4.3.12, Solaris 10
address@hidden/bin/ksh} and @code{/usr/xpg4/bin/sh}, and AT&T @code{ksh93} 
(2011).
+Still, @code{SIGQUIT} seems to be trappable quite portably within all
+these shells.  OTOH, some other shells doesn't special-case the handling
+of @code{SIGQUIT}; among these shells are at least @code{pdksh} 5.2.14,
+Solaris 10 and NetBSD 5.1 @code{/bin/sh}, and the Almquist Shell 0.5.5.1.
+
+Some shells (especially Korn shells and derivatives) might try to
+propagate to themselves a signal that has killed a child process; this is
+not a bug, but a conscious design choice (although its overall value might
+be debatable).  The exact details of how this is attained vary from shell
+to shell.  For example, upon running @code{perl -e 'kill 2, $$'}, after
+the perl process has been interrupted AT&T @code{ksh93} (2011) will
+proceed to send itself a @code{SIGINT}, while Solaris 10 @code{/bin/ksh}
+and @code{/usr/xpg4/bin/sh} will proceed to exit with status 130 (i.e.,
+128 + 2). In any case, if there is an active trap associated with
address@hidden, those shells will correctly execute it.
+
 @node File System Conventions
 @section File System Conventions
 @cindex File system conventions


hooks/post-receive
-- 
GNU Autoconf source repository