[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows
From: |
Arash Esbati |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows |
Date: |
Sun, 08 Jan 2017 19:49:04 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.91 |
Hi Mosè,
Mosè Giordano <address@hidden> writes:
> 2017-01-08 19:13 GMT+01:00 Arash Esbati <address@hidden>:
>> I suggest that we also
>> emphasize more in the official documentation that ELPA is the preferred
>> way to go. WDYT?
>
> The installation section of the manual starts with
>
> The simplest way of installing AUCTeX is by using the Emacs package
> manager
> integrated in Emacs 24 and greater (ELPA).
>
> and the description of the process takes more or less one other line.
> It looks pretty clear to me, but this isn't probably sufficient, since
> sometimes I see people in trouble trying to compile the package from
> source. If you have ideas on how to improve it, please go ahead.
I think one point that may be confusing is your quote above from section
"1.2 Installing AUCTeX" and this part from "1.3 Quick Start":
If AUCTeX is installed, you might still need to activate it, by
inserting
(load "auctex.el" nil t t)
in your user init file.(1) If you’ve installed AUCTeX from the Emacs
package manager (ELPA), you must not have this line in your user init
file. The installation procedure already cares about loading AUCTeX
correctly.
My suggestion is to have in "1.2 Installing AUCTeX" something like:
The modern and strongly recommended way of installing AUCTeX is by
using the Emacs package manager integrated in Emacs 24 and greater
(ELPA) ... That’s all. See section "1.3 Quick Start" for further
instructions after this step.
Before I write some text: If I get it right, one can have
(package-initialize) in his .emacs and then the sentence from "1.3 Quick
Start" does not apply anymore. Is this correct?
Best, Arash
- [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows, Mosè Giordano, 2017/01/07
- Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows, gojjoe, 2017/01/07
- Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows, Arash Esbati, 2017/01/08
- Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows, Mosè Giordano, 2017/01/08
- Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows,
Arash Esbati <=
- Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows, Mosè Giordano, 2017/01/08
- Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows, Arash Esbati, 2017/01/09
- Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows, Mosè Giordano, 2017/01/09
- Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows, Arash Esbati, 2017/01/10
- Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows, Mosè Giordano, 2017/01/10
- Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows, Arash Esbati, 2017/01/10
- Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows, Mosè Giordano, 2017/01/10
- Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows, Arash Esbati, 2017/01/10