[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[AUCTeX-diffs] Changes to auctex/doc/preview-faq.texi
From: |
Ralf Angeli |
Subject: |
[AUCTeX-diffs] Changes to auctex/doc/preview-faq.texi |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 04:58:26 -0400 |
Index: auctex/doc/preview-faq.texi
diff -u auctex/doc/preview-faq.texi:1.1 auctex/doc/preview-faq.texi:1.2
--- auctex/doc/preview-faq.texi:1.1 Wed Jun 8 07:16:21 2005
+++ auctex/doc/preview-faq.texi Thu Jun 16 08:58:25 2005
@@ -45,12 +45,15 @@
@previewlatex{} nominally requires @w{GNU Emacs} with a version of at
least 21.1. However, @w{Emacs 22} (currently under development) offers
superior performance and wider platform support, and is even now the
-recommended platform to use. While XEmacs is still basically supported
-by the @AUCTeX{} team in spite of having almost no XEmacs users among
-them, @previewlatex{} and @AUCTeX{} support is not a priority for XEmacs
-developers. This makes getting XEmacs bugs and shortcomings fixed such
-an inefficient and unpleasant task that we can't in good conscience
-recommend XEmacs to users that rely on continued support of @AUCTeX{}.
+recommended platform to use.
+
+While recent versions of @w{XEmacs 21.4} are supported, doing this in a
+satisfactory manner has proven to be difficult due to technical
+shortcomings and differing API's which are hard to come by. If
address@hidden is an important part of your editing workflow, you are
+likely to get better results and support by switching to Emacs. Of
+course, you can improve support for your favorite editor by giving
+feedback in case you encounter bugs.
@subsection Which versions of Ghostscript and @AUCTeX{} are needed?