[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AUCTeX and "builtin latex mode" integration
From: |
Ikumi Keita |
Subject: |
Re: AUCTeX and "builtin latex mode" integration |
Date: |
Mon, 15 May 2023 20:09:59 +0900 |
Hi Arash,
>>>>> Arash Esbati <arash@gnu.org> writes:
> Yes, it was about "Unfriendly take-over of AUCTeX once installed", but I
> think somewhere in the discussion, there was also sort of
> "latex-mode-hook vs. LaTeX-mode-hook is confusing".
I haven't arrived at such claims yet.
> I was thinking about the mode names only; and not the namespace for
> functions/variables and the file names. Suppose the major mode is
> called AUCLaTeX-mode, then we have `AUCLaTeX-mode-hook' and we then
> define an alias `LaTeX-mode-hook' for a certain period of time. Does
> this make sense?
Do you mean that new prefix is used for only mode/hook/keymap/syntax
table/abbrev table names and `LaTeX-mode-hook' etc. will be removed in
future?
Hmm. That might be a possible option, but it doesn't seem clean to me.
Regards,
Ikumi Keita
#StandWithUkraine #StopWarInUkraine
Re: AUCTeX and "builtin latex mode" integration, Arash Esbati, 2023/05/08