[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: indentation problem II
From: |
Ikumi Keita |
Subject: |
Re: indentation problem II |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Apr 2022 20:33:41 +0900 |
>>>>> Arash Esbati <arash@gnu.org> writes:
>>> +(defun LaTeX-item-equation-matrix ()
>>
>> Maybe the function name should be reconsidered since it has little
>> to do with equation.
> I admit that amsmath.el is not really consistent about name-space.
> Other functions in that style also go with '-equation-'. We could clean
> up, sometimes :-]
Most use cases of `LaTeX-item-equation' are for extended environments
based on equation environment, e.g. align and gather, so I think it's
reasonable to have name with "equation". On the contrary, matrix type
environments are not for writing equations.
>> P.S. Oops, it's too late. You already have installed the commit in the
>> git repo.
> Thanks for your comments. Do you think we should touch the style with
> any of the above?
They aren't so important, so it wouldn't be worth changing now :-)
Regards,
Ikumi Keita
#StandWithUkraine #StopWarInUkraine
- Re: [Culprit found prettify-symbols-mode] (was: indentation problem II), (continued)
- Re: indentation problem II, Arash Esbati, 2022/04/21
- Re: indentation problem II, Ikumi Keita, 2022/04/21
- Re: indentation problem II, Uwe Brauer, 2022/04/21
- Re: indentation problem II, Arash Esbati, 2022/04/21
- Re: indentation problem II, Uwe Brauer, 2022/04/21
- Re: indentation problem II, Uwe Brauer, 2022/04/21
- Re: indentation problem II, Arash Esbati, 2022/04/22
- Re: indentation problem II, Ikumi Keita, 2022/04/22
- Re: indentation problem II, Arash Esbati, 2022/04/22
- Re: indentation problem II,
Ikumi Keita <=