[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] New entry in amsmath.el
From: |
Ikumi Keita |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] New entry in amsmath.el |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Oct 2019 21:45:14 +0900 |
Hi Arash,
>>>>> Arash Esbati <address@hidden> writes:
> Thanks for checking. I think the confusing issue here `Accent symbol'
> vs. `Accented symbol'. Take for instance the entry for `overset'. The
> first argument is the `Accent symbol' and the second one would be the
> accented one. Looking at the diff above, I think we should just change
> the entries to:
> '("overset" "Above symbol" "Symbol")
> '("underset" "Below symbol" "Symbol")
> '("overunderset" "Above symbol" "Below symbol" "Symbol")
> WDYT, does it make sense?
Oh, I'm very sorry. I was totally confused about it.
>> (The order of the arguments is different from \overset and \underset...
>> I wonder why amsmath developer chose such confusing order.)
> I'm not sure if I understand this comment. This code looks consistent
> to me:
Exactly. Why didn't I look at definitions of \overset and \underset as
well?
I apologize to all for my careless comments.
Best regards,
Ikumi Keita