[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] support for xemacs
From: |
Mosè Giordano |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] support for xemacs |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Mar 2017 12:49:20 +0100 |
Hi Arash,
2017-03-16 12:29 GMT+01:00 Arash Esbati <address@hidden>:
> Uwe Brauer <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>>>> "Arash" == Arash Esbati <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> > Would this work for XEmacs? I don't have XEmacs at hand so I can't
>> test
>> > it myself. I would apply the same thing to other style files as well.
>>
>> I will try this out this weekend with 21.5.X and report back
>
> Great, thanks! Here also a small .tex file to test with:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> \documentclass{article}
> \usepackage{amsmath}
> \usepackage[overload]{empheq}
>
> \begin{document}
> \begin{empheq}[left=\empheqlbrace]{alignat = %
> 2}
> \label{eq:1}
> x &= y_1-\dots &\quad& \text{Hit M-RET at EOL}
> \end{empheq}
> \end{document}
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
I tested the patch in XEmacs 21.4.24, seems to work. If I set
`alignat' to 5 I get 9 &s, is it correct, right? They should be
2 * ncols - 1, no?
Bye,
Mosè
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] support for xemacs, Arash Esbati, 2017/03/16
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] support for xemacs, Ikumi Keita, 2017/03/16
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] support for xemacs, Arash Esbati, 2017/03/16
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] support for xemacs, Arash Esbati, 2017/03/18
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] support for xemacs, Uwe Brauer, 2017/03/18
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] support for xemacs, Arash Esbati, 2017/03/18
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] support for xemacs, Uwe Brauer, 2017/03/18
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] support for xemacs, Arash Esbati, 2017/03/19