[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] patch for the exam class.
From: |
Arash Esbati |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] patch for the exam class. |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Dec 2016 15:32:26 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 |
Hi Uwe,
Uwe Brauer <address@hidden> writes:
> I send a patch (in 2 formats since I am not 100 % sure) which provides
> support for the exam class. Thanks very much to essential contributions
> from Arash.
You're welcome. I keep on giving some comments, I hope it's ok :-)
> +;;; Code:
> +
> +;;; Code:
You have a dupe here.
> +(defcustom LaTeX-exam-reftex-quick-id-key ?x
> + "Unique letter identifying exam class macros in RefTeX.
> +
> +A character argument for quick identification when RefTeX inserts
> +new labels with `reftex-label'. It must be unique. It is
> +initialized to ?x."
> + :group 'LaTeX-style
> + :type 'character)
> +
> +(defcustom LaTeX-exam-label "exm:"
> + "Default prefix to labels in environments of exam class."
> + :group 'LaTeX-style
> + :type 'string)
You should move these 2 variables into `tex-style.el' -- it contains
customizable variables for AUCTeX style files.
> + (TeX-add-symbols
> + '("part" [ "Points" ] (TeX-arg-literal " "))
> + '("subpart" [ "Points" ] (TeX-arg-literal " "))
> + '("gradetable" [ "1. Option" ](TeX-arg-literal "")[ "2. Option"
> ](TeX-arg-literal ""))
> + '("partialgradetable" 1 [ "1. Option" ](TeX-arg-literal "")[ "2. Option"
> ](TeX-arg-literal ""))
What's the rationale behind the (TeX-arg-literal "") here? You could
write something like:
'("gradetable"
[ TeX-arg-eval completing-read
(TeX-argument-prompt optional nil "Orientation")
'("v" "h") ]
[ TeX-arg-eval completing-read
(TeX-argument-prompt optional nil "Table index")
'("questions" "pages") ] )
> + '("subsubpart" [ "Points" ] (TeX-arg-literal " "))
> + '("question" ["Points"] (TeX-arg-literal " "))
> + '("subpart" ["Points"] (TeX-arg-literal " "))
> + '("subsubpart" ["Points"] (TeX-arg-literal " "))
These 2 are also dupes.
> + '("extrafootheight" ["Measure"] (TeX-arg-literal " "))
I'm not an exam user, but I think this defintion is wrong. examdoc.pdf
page 99 says a usage like \extrafootheight[.5in]{.25in}. I would then
suggest something like
'("extrafootheight" [ TeX-arg-length "Extra height 1. page footer" ]
(TeX-arg-length "Extra height footers"))
> + '("Alph" 0) ;ok
> + '("Roman" 0) ;ok
> + '("alph" 0) ;ok
> + '("arabic" 0) ;ok
These are already in latex.el. You don't need them.
> + '("answerlinelength" 1) ;ok
> + '("answerskip" 1) ;ok
These are set with \setlength in document? If so, you should move them
out of (TeX-add-symbols ...) and set them with (LaTeX-add-lengths):
(LaTeX-add-lengths "answerlinelength" "answerskip")
> + '("colorbox" 0) ;ok
You should drop this. \colorbox is defined in color.el and xcolor.el.
Depending on which package used by the user, this command will become
available. And while we're at it: page 70 says that the command
\shadedsolutions can be used if \usepackage{color} is in the preamble.
Then I suggest you move this line:
> + '("shadedsolutions" 0) ;ok
out of TeX-add-symbols and do something like this in the style hook:
(when (or (member "xcolor" (TeX-style-list))
(member "color" (TeX-style-list)))
(TeX-add-symbols '("shadedsolutions" 0)))
Best, Arash
- [AUCTeX-devel] patch for the exam class., Uwe Brauer, 2016/12/22
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] patch for the exam class.,
Arash Esbati <=
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] patch for the exam class., Uwe Brauer, 2016/12/26
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] patch for the exam class., Arash Esbati, 2016/12/26
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] patch for the exam class., Uwe Brauer, 2016/12/26
- [AUCTeX-devel] [corrected patch] (was: patch for the exam class.), Uwe Brauer, 2016/12/26
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] [corrected patch] (was: patch for the exam class.), Mosè Giordano, 2016/12/29
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] [corrected patch], Uwe Brauer, 2016/12/29
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] [corrected patch], Mosè Giordano, 2016/12/29
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] [corrected patch], Uwe Brauer, 2016/12/29
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] [corrected patch], Mosè Giordano, 2016/12/29
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] [corrected patch], Arash Esbati, 2016/12/30