[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] preview.sty included in GNU ELPA problematic
From: |
Ken Brown |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] preview.sty included in GNU ELPA problematic |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Jul 2014 21:32:04 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 |
On 7/10/2014 8:22 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
The version of preview.sty included in the GNU ELPA has the wrong date
format.
This has already been fixed in the Git repository:
commit f3ef07c4bfab2ebf0183ec0468e45b23feccf77d
Author: Tassilo Horn <address@hidden>
Date: Mon Apr 8 08:28:10 2013 +0200
Fix for conversion to git.
* latex/preview.dtx: Fix date format which got converted from
YYYY/MM/DD to YYYY-MM-DD during conversion to git.
diff --git a/preview/ChangeLog b/preview/ChangeLog
index e0d71fa..07ade79 100644
--- a/preview/ChangeLog
+++ b/preview/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2013-04-08 Tassilo Horn <address@hidden>
+
+ * latex/preview.dtx: Fix date format which got converted from
+ YYYY/MM/DD to YYYY-MM-DD during conversion to git.
+
2012-12-04 Tassilo Horn <address@hidden>
Merge revno 314 (Stefan Monnier) from emacs elpa branch: Shorten
diff --git a/preview/latex/preview.dtx b/preview/latex/preview.dtx
index 97b7a52..57fccf4 100644
--- a/preview/latex/preview.dtx
+++ b/preview/latex/preview.dtx
@@ -444,7 +444,7 @@
\def\next release_{} \lccode`\_=`.
\edef\next{\lowercase{\endgroup
address@hidden@version}}} \next \fi
address@hidden $Date: 2010-02-14 16:19:00 $
address@hidden $Date: 2010/02/14 16:19:00 $
\edef\next{\noexpand\ProvidesPackage{preview}%
[\next\space address@hidden (AUCTeX/preview-latex)]}
\next
Ken
- [AUCTeX-devel] preview.sty included in GNU ELPA problematic, Ivan Andrus, 2014/07/10
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] preview.sty included in GNU ELPA problematic,
Ken Brown <=
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] preview.sty included in GNU ELPA problematic, Ivan Andrus, 2014/07/13
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] preview.sty included in GNU ELPA problematic, Mosè Giordano, 2014/07/13
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] preview.sty included in GNU ELPA problematic, Ken Brown, 2014/07/13
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] preview.sty included in GNU ELPA problematic, Tassilo Horn, 2014/07/14
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] preview.sty included in GNU ELPA problematic, Ivan Andrus, 2014/07/16
- [AUCTeX-devel] Why isn't a new AUCTeX ELPA release triggered? (was: preview.sty included in GNU ELPA problematic), Tassilo Horn, 2014/07/17
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Why isn't a new AUCTeX ELPA release triggered?, Stefan Monnier, 2014/07/18
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Why isn't a new AUCTeX ELPA release triggered?, Stefan Monnier, 2014/07/18
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Why isn't a new AUCTeX ELPA release triggered?, Tassilo Horn, 2014/07/21