[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] A few patches for AUCTeX
From: |
Tassilo Horn |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] A few patches for AUCTeX |
Date: |
Wed, 03 Apr 2013 17:19:22 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Leo,
> [1. text/x-patch;
> 0001-Fix-a-bug-in-LaTeX-outline-level-for-customised-outl.patch]
Could you please provide some insights to when this patch makes a
difference?
> [3. text/x-patch; 0003-Fix-a-bug-causing-Invalid-face-reference-quote.patch]
When do you get the invalid face reference? I've tried setting
(setq font-latex-user-keyword-classes
'(("shadow-hidden" (("hide" "{"))
'((((class color) (min-colors 88) (background light))
:background "darkseagreen2")
(((class color) (min-colors 88) (background dark))
:background "darkolivegreen")
(((class color) (min-colors 16) (background light))
:background "darkseagreen2")
(((class color) (min-colors 16) (background dark))
:background "darkolivegreen")
(((class color) (min-colors 8))
:background "green" :foreground "black")
(t :inverse-video t)) command)
("shadow-mycomment" (("mycomment" "{")) shadow command)
("shadow-comment" (("comment" "{")) shadow command)))
so that I both specify a face using a face specification and using its
name, but I don't see any difference (nor errors) with or without your
patch.
Thanks,
Tassilo