[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?
From: |
Ralf Angeli |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release? |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Nov 2012 20:21:52 +0100 |
* Tassilo Horn (2012-11-30) writes:
> Of course, it has to be (featurep 'emacs). ;-)
Yeah, I forgot to wrap the original proposal into a `(not ...)'. Since
I've never heard of `(featurep 'emacs)' I've now changed it to the more
conventional `(not (featurep 'xemacs))'.
--
Ralf
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, (continued)
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, Ralf Angeli, 2012/11/09
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, Tassilo Horn, 2012/11/10
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, Ralf Angeli, 2012/11/10
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, Ralf Angeli, 2012/11/28
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, Tassilo Horn, 2012/11/28
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, Ralf Angeli, 2012/11/29
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, Tassilo Horn, 2012/11/30
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, Uwe Brauer, 2012/11/30
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, Tassilo Horn, 2012/11/30
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?,
Ralf Angeli <=