Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Repository for RefTeX

[David Kastrup]

Ralf Angeli <address@hidden> writes:

> * David Kastrup (2007-01-27) writes:
>
>> Ralf Angeli <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> We could also consider putting the Lisp files into their own `lisp'
>>> directory.
>>
>> Also sounds reasonable.  Seems consistent with a separate doc
>> directory.  Of course, this might buy us additional Makefiles.  At the
>> current point of time, I have absolutely no idea what kind of changes
>> could trouble what kind of users.
>
> Okay, here is an updated proposal:
>
> reftex/CHANGES
> reftex/COPYING
> reftex/ChangeLog
> reftex/INSTALL
> reftex/Makefile
> reftex/README
> reftex/lisp/Makefile
> reftex/lisp/lpath.el
> reftex/lisp/reftex-auc.el
> reftex/lisp/reftex-cite.el
> reftex/lisp/reftex-dcr.el
> reftex/lisp/reftex-global.el
> reftex/lisp/reftex-index.el
> reftex/lisp/reftex-parse.el
> reftex/lisp/reftex-ref.el
> reftex/lisp/reftex-sel.el
> reftex/lisp/reftex-toc.el
> reftex/lisp/reftex-vars.el
> reftex/lisp/reftex.el
> reftex/doc/Makefile
> reftex/doc/reftex.texi
>
> The Lisp files got their own directory and I've tentatively listed
> Makefile files in subdirectories.
>
> If everybody agrees on that I can ask the Savannah admins to set up
> the `reftex' module and copy over RefTeX files from the Emacs
> repository including the change history.

Fine with me.  You should check, however, where the original Makefile
should end up.  It might even make sense to copy its history to more
than one location, but I guess that's up to you.  In any case, we
should wait at least another day for people to voice concerns before
asking at Savannah.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum