[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[AUCTeX-devel] Re: Future AUCTeX distribution
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
[AUCTeX-devel] Re: Future AUCTeX distribution |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:02:51 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.5-b24 (dandelion, linux) |
>>>>> "David" == David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
David> I think that in interest of coherence and of the users, we
David> should just bite the bullet and put the XEmacs package up
David> for download ourselves,
This is what I recommend (and have always recommended). This is what
VM does.
David> The question is what to do with the version in the XEmacs
David> package tree and available from its servers.
The version in the package tree should stay there. Anybody who gets
it from our CVS should know what they're doing (that's a normative
statement, not informative).
Whether tarballs should be available or not is up to Uwe, mostly, and
Norbert.
--
School of Systems and Information Engineering http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.
- [AUCTeX-devel] Future AUCTeX distribution, David Kastrup, 2006/01/12
- [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Future AUCTeX distribution,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Future AUCTeX distribution, David Kastrup, 2006/01/13
- [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Future AUCTeX distribution, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2006/01/14
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Future AUCTeX distribution, David Kastrup, 2006/01/14
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Future AUCTeX distribution, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2006/01/15
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Future AUCTeX distribution, David Kastrup, 2006/01/15
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Future AUCTeX distribution, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2006/01/15