[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] permission for using auctex code in wikipedia-mode.el
From: |
Uwe Brauer |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] permission for using auctex code in wikipedia-mode.el |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Nov 2005 12:04:29 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) XEmacs/21.4.17 (linux) |
>>>>> "David" == David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
David> Uwe Brauer <address@hidden> writes:
>> I am currently thinking of including, after appropriate modification,
>> some Latex-like functionality such as TeX-font, `TeX-insert-macro'
>> LaTeX-insert-item, LaTeX-section into wikipedia-mode.el
>>
>> Do I have your permission?
David> Who is "you"? AUCTeX is released under the GPL and has been
David> since its inception (necessarily so since it was derived
David> from early Emacs modes). As such, the permission of the
David> authors can be assumed as long as the results are released
David> under the GPL. However, the copyright is distributed over a
David> number of contributors. While recent contributions are all
David> assigned to the FSF (which makes releasing under anything
David> but the GPL pretty much impossible), not all historical
David> contributors have been rounded up so far. The copyright
David> status and its tracking thus is somewhat similar to XEmacs
David> or the Linux kernel: not in one hand. It is reasonably
David> clear that all contributors have intended to contribute
David> under the conditions of the GPL, but there is no written
David> guarantee that not some stuff might have been contributed in
David> the past for which the rights would be hard to actually
David> clear.
Thanks, right, given the complicated `status' of the authors, I
preferred not to specify the term `you' too much. I also thought that
asking for permission would be a gesture of politeness, that's why I
did it.
And of course my enhancement of wikipedia-mode.el would be released
under the GPL.
Uwe