Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: auctex.spec: auctex.el/preview-latex.el vs. suse-start-*.el

[Ralf Angeli]

* Reiner Steib (2005-10-06) writes:

> On Sun, Oct 02 2005, Ralf Angeli wrote:
>
>> * Reiner Steib (2005-09-28) writes:
>>
>>> The disadvantage of this is that the docs (see "grep -nH -e auctex.el
>>> doc/*.texi") refer to `auctex.el'.
>>
>> If this is the only problem I think we can keep it the way it is.
>
> Would it do any harm if we install it under the original name
> `auctex.el' and `suse-start-auctex.el'?

Then `auctex.el' wouldn't have any function, right?  I'd find that
confusing.

> I'd suggest to re-include the spec file in the `tar-ball' Makefile
> target.  Maybe we should move the RPM generation from `full-release'
> to a separate target?

Fine with me.  In my opinion `full-release' doesn't even have to
depend on or call this target respectively.

-- 
Ralf