[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX] Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Problem?
From: |
Svend Tollak Munkejord |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX] Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Problem? |
Date: |
Sun, 03 Jul 2005 14:13:35 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
On 2005-07-03, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> Ralf Angeli <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> * David Kastrup (2005-07-03) writes:
>>
>>> Hm, so for XEmacs, the default of the variable is different, but for
>>> Emacs 21.3, the code ignores the setting?
>>>
>>> Isn't that kind of inconsistent?
>>
>> The idea was that Emacs 21 users at least get the font scaling.
>
> I seem to remember a number of complaints that this was extremely
> confusing without raising/lowering. I thought we had changed this to
> not do anything on Emacs 21. Checking this with an actual Emacs 21, I
> find that indeed this is not so.
>
> So I want to ask on the auctex list: are there any users of Emacs-21,
> AUCTeX and font-lock around?
Hello :-)
> If there are: do you use the default setting of
> font-latex-fontify-script, or have you changed it?
I use (setq font-latex-fontify-script nil), since I often use long
superscripts and subscripts (i.e., long in terms of characters in the
.tex file), and I think it is more readable to have everything
full-size.
--
Svend Tollak Munkejord
- [AUCTeX-devel] Problem?, David Kastrup, 2005/07/02
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Problem?, Ralf Angeli, 2005/07/03
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Problem?, David Kastrup, 2005/07/03
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Problem?, Ralf Angeli, 2005/07/03
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Problem?, David Kastrup, 2005/07/03
- Re: [AUCTeX] Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Problem?,
Svend Tollak Munkejord <=
- [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Problem?, Christian Schlauer, 2005/07/04
- [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Problem?, Sebastian Luque, 2005/07/04
- [AUCTeX-devel] Re: [AUCTeX] Re: Problem?, David Kastrup, 2005/07/04
- [AUCTeX-devel] Re: [AUCTeX] Re: Problem?, Sebastian Luque, 2005/07/04
- [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Problem?, Ralf Angeli, 2005/07/03