Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: [AUCTeX-commit] auctex tex.el

[David Kastrup]

David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:

> If nobody has an objection, I'll check it in.

Done.  Of course at the time I wrote this nobody had an objection
(yet), so in the strict sense of the word I have not been lying.

It is all for the best.  Or something.

> Even though it is late in the run, the old code does not make sense.
> And I am afraid that I still have more invasive stuff to finish in
> preview-latex, so there will have to be more testing, anyway.

Not to mention that I still have to reorganize the installation to a
state where one can package the whole caboodle into a consistent state
for RPMs and or XEmacs, and write recommendations for packagers.

Sigh.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum