[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [aspell-devel] Problems with aspell-en license
From: |
Glenn Maynard |
Subject: |
Re: [aspell-devel] Problems with aspell-en license |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Oct 2002 04:01:02 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 01:52:18AM -0600, John Galt wrote:
> No, it's legal boilerplate. You can't testify to things that AREN'T to
> the best of your knowlege. At worst it's redundant.
Okay.
> >> Actually it isn't a granting of right, but a Testimonial that those rights
> >> exist. It means that you have recourse if sued to go after the one making
> >> the Testimony for your costs. In Debian, a Testimony that rights exist
> >> has usually been enough to cover for a license, but the term "license" for
> >> that is rather ambiguous, I'd agree.
Kevin, did you (or whoever wrote and is responsible for this) intend this as
a testimony?
--
Glenn Maynard
- Re: [aspell-devel] Problems with aspell-en license,
Glenn Maynard <=
- Re: [aspell-devel] Problems with aspell-en license, Kevin Atkinson, 2002/10/20
- Re: [aspell-devel] Problems with aspell-en license, Glenn Maynard, 2002/10/20
- Re: [aspell-devel] Problems with aspell-en license, Kevin Atkinson, 2002/10/21
- Re: [aspell-devel] Problems with aspell-en license, Kevin Atkinson, 2002/10/21
- Re: [aspell-devel] Problems with aspell-en license, Glenn Maynard, 2002/10/21
- Re: [aspell-devel] Problems with aspell-en license, Branden Robinson, 2002/10/21
- Re: [aspell-devel] Problems with aspell-en license, John Goerzen, 2002/10/21
- Re: [aspell-devel] Problems with aspell-en license, Branden Robinson, 2002/10/21
- Re: [aspell-devel] Problems with aspell-en license, John Goerzen, 2002/10/22
- Re: [aspell-devel] Problems with aspell-en license, Branden Robinson, 2002/10/22