Re: [Arx-users] Why not ArX?

arx-users

I got a response.  The article is almost done, so they won't include
ArX.  I guess we were too late :(

Maybe they print something once 2.x (2.2?) is relased. Or they agree toprint something.. If you don't mind then I contact them about it.


Cheers,
Marc

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

Re: [Arx-users] Why not ArX?, (continued)
- Re: [Arx-users] Why not ArX?, Kevin Smith, 2004/12/02
  - Re: [Arx-users] Why not ArX?, Walter Landry, 2004/12/02
    - [Arx-users] Ease of use (was: Why not ArX?), Kevin Smith, 2004/12/02
    - Re: [Arx-users] Ease of use, Walter Landry, 2004/12/02
    - [Arx-users] Boost license (was: Why not ArX?), Kevin Smith, 2004/12/04
    - Re: [Arx-users] Boost license, Walter Landry, 2004/12/04
    - Re: [Arx-users] Boost license, Kevin Smith, 2004/12/04
- Re: [Arx-users] Why not ArX?, Felix Breuer, 2004/12/04
  - Re: [Arx-users] Why not ArX?, Walter Landry, 2004/12/08
    - Re: [Arx-users] Why not ArX?, Walter Landry, 2004/12/08
    - Re: [Arx-users] Why not ArX?, Marc Recht <=
    - Re: [Arx-users] Why not ArX?, Walter Landry, 2004/12/08