[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Arx-users] Re: ArX and tla
From: |
Neil Stevens |
Subject: |
[Arx-users] Re: ArX and tla |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 21:15:44 -0800 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.4 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday January 06, 2004 7:53 pm, Walter Landry wrote:
> My current plan is to implement checksums and signed archives
> according to
>
> http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/arx-users/2003-11/msg00004.html
>
> which I believe is different from the way that tla has done it
> (although they don't seem to have completely decided what they are
> doing).
1.2pre0 shipped with checksums and signed checksums. A future version is
going to switch from MD5 sums to SHA sums, but the design has been decided
upon and implemented.
Not that I think ArX/tla compatibility is important, but I figure that's
worth pointing out.
- --
Neil Stevens - address@hidden
"Any person or government that supports, protects, or harbors terrorists
is complicit in the murder of the innocent and will be held to account."
-- Vice President Richard B. Cheney
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQE/+5YAf7mnligQOmERAhhPAJ0dMo72Z8dbsk1X9PeSYcB33FQv1wCfahwg
FGlp37qlNzGWnP+rPjni1tg=
=tRvw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----