Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

automake (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Thu Mar 31 2011 02:47:21 -0400 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• March 31, 2011
  • Re: Removing Mac OS X resource forks from distribution tarballs, Dave Hart, 02:47
  • Re: Removing Mac OS X resource forks from distribution tarballs, Peter O'Gorman, 02:30
  • Re: documentation on using automake to produce documentation, Ralf Wildenhues, 01:55
  • Re: Removing Mac OS X resource forks from distribution tarballs, Ralf Wildenhues, 01:29
• March 30, 2011
  • documentation on using automake to produce documentation, Paul Elliott, 20:25
  • Re: Removing Mac OS X resource forks from distribution tarballs, Dave Hart, 17:06
  • Re: Removing Mac OS X resource forks from distribution tarballs, Adam Mercer, 16:56
  • Re: Removing Mac OS X resource forks from distribution tarballs, Ralf Wildenhues, 12:46
  • Removing Mac OS X resource forks from distribution tarballs, Adam Mercer, 12:34
  • Re: subdir-objects, dirstamps and --disable-dependency-tracking (bug!), Ignacy Gawedzki, 04:13
  • Re: subdir-objects, dirstamps and --disable-dependency-tracking (bug?), Ralf Wildenhues, 01:51
• March 29, 2011
  • subdir-objects, dirstamps and --disable-dependency-tracking (bug?), Ignacy Gawedzki, 22:50
  • Re: [GSoC Proposal] automake - Exploit more features of GNU make in Automake, Dr. David Kirkby, 03:32
  • Re: [GSoC Proposal] automake - Exploit more features of GNU make in Automake, Stefano Lattarini, 02:54
• March 28, 2011
  • Re: [GSoC Proposal] automake - Exploit more features of GNU make in Automake, Stefano Lattarini, 19:19
  • Re: [GSoC Proposal] automake - Interfacing with a test protocol like TAP or subunit, Stefano Lattarini, 18:36
  • Re: link dependency failed with make -j*, Vincent Torri, 17:52
  • Re: link dependency failed with make -j*, Ralf Wildenhues, 04:12
  • Re: link dependency failed with make -j*, Vincent Torri, 00:40
• March 27, 2011
  • Re: link dependency failed with make -j*, Bob Friesenhahn, 19:10
  • link dependency failed with make -j*, Vincent Torri, 16:39
• March 26, 2011
  • Re: Makefiles, Stefano Lattarini, 05:03
• March 25, 2011
  • Re: Question about automake fails to pass the correct parameters to pax when using large UID/GID, Kumar Gala, 18:09
• March 23, 2011
  • Makefiles, Lucas, 14:04
• March 22, 2011
  • Re: [GSoC Proposal] automake - Interfacing with a test protocol like TAP or subunit, Stefano Lattarini, 15:54
  • Re: GSoC project idea: non-recursive automake project, NightStrike, 12:26
  • Re: GSoC project idea: non-recursive automake project, Nick Bowler, 10:51
  • Re: GSoC project idea: non-recursive automake project, Ben Pfaff, 10:36
  • Re: c file used as a make file, Paul Elliott, 10:02
  • Re: c file used as a make file, Ralf Corsepius, 03:29
  • Re: c file used as a make file, Russ Allbery, 03:19
  • c file used as a make file, Paul Elliott, 02:54
  • Re: [GSoC Proposal] automake - Interfacing with a test protocol like TAP or subunit, Jelmer Vernooij, 02:05
• March 21, 2011
  • Re: [GSoC Proposal] automake - Interfacing with a test protocol like TAP or subunit, Robert Collins, 17:48
  • Re: don't install .la do install .so, Paul Elliott, 17:24
  • Re: don't install .la do install .so, Andrew W. Nosenko, 16:29
  • Re: [GSoC Proposal] automake - Interfacing with a test protocol like TAP or subunit, Stefano Lattarini, 15:42
  • Re: don't install .la do install .so, Nick Bowler, 15:42
  • Re: GSoC project idea: non-recursive automake project, Steffen Dettmer, 15:37
  • Re: don't install .la do install .so, Paul Elliott, 15:14
  • Re: GSoC project idea: non-recursive automake project, Nick Bowler, 15:09
  • Re: GSoC project idea: non-recursive automake project, Roger Leigh, 14:36
  • Re: don't install .la do install .so, Andrew W. Nosenko, 14:26
  • Re: don't install .la do install .so, Peter O'Gorman, 14:26
  • Re: don't install .la do install .so, Nick Bowler, 14:26
  • don't install .la do install .so, Paul Elliott, 13:21
  • Re: GSoC project idea: non-recursive automake project, NightStrike, 13:21
• March 20, 2011
  • Re: Do convenience libraries propagate -R linker flags?, Rhys Ulerich, 23:43
  • Re: GSoC project idea: non-recursive automake project, John Calcote, 16:34
  • Re: [GSoC Proposal] automake - Interfacing with a test protocol like TAP or subunit, Ralf Wildenhues, 14:13
  • Re: [GSoC Proposal] automake - Interfacing with a test protocol like TAP or subunit, Daniel Herring, 13:21
  • Re: [GSoC Proposal] automake - Interfacing with a test protocol like TAP or subunit, Stefano Lattarini, 08:41
  • Re: [GSoC Proposal] automake - Interfacing with a test protocol like TAP or subunit, Stefano Lattarini, 07:33
  • Re: [GSoC Proposal] automake - Interfacing with a test protocol like TAP or subunit, Ralf Wildenhues, 07:18
  • Re: [GSoC Proposal] automake - Interfacing with a test protocol like TAP or subunit, Ralf Wildenhues, 06:43
  • Re: [GSoC Proposal] automake - Interfacing with a test protocol like TAP or subunit, Stefano Lattarini, 06:42
  • Re: [GSoC Proposal] automake - Interfacing with a test protocol like TAP or subunit, Robert Collins, 05:35
  • Re: [GSoC Proposal] automake - Interfacing with a test protocol like TAP or subunit, Robert Collins, 05:03
  • Re: [GSoC Proposal] automake - Interfacing with a test protocol like TAP or subunit, Stefano Lattarini, 05:03
  • Re: GSoC project idea: non-recursive automake project, Ralf Wildenhues, 04:50
  • Re: [GSoC Proposal] automake - Interfacing with a test protocol like TAP or subunit, Ralf Wildenhues, 03:53
  • Re: [GSoC Proposal] automake - Interfacing with a test protocol like TAP or subunit, Robert Collins, 00:10
• March 19, 2011
  • Re: GSoC project idea: non-recursive automake project, Harlan Stenn, 15:47
  • Re: GSoC project idea: non-recursive automake project, Harlan Stenn, 15:45
  • Re: GSoC project idea: non-recursive automake project, Harlan Stenn, 15:31
  • Re: [GSoC Proposal] automake - Interfacing with a test protocol like TAP or subunit, Stefano Lattarini, 07:21
  • Re: GSoC project idea: non-recursive automake project, Pippijn van Steenhoven, 07:13
  • Re: GSoC project idea: non-recursive automake project, Pippijn van Steenhoven, 07:13
  • Re: GSoC project idea: non-recursive automake project, Pippijn van Steenhoven, 07:13
  • Re: GSoC project idea: non-recursive automake project, Ralf Wildenhues, 07:08
• March 18, 2011
  • GSoC project idea: non-recursive automake project, Harlan Stenn, 20:27
  • Re: [GSoC Proposal] automake - Interfacing with a test protocol like TAP or subunit, Harlan Stenn, 20:25
  • [GSoC Proposal] automake - Interfacing with a test protocol like TAP or subunit, Stefano Lattarini, 20:04
  • [GSoC Proposal] automake - Exploit more features of GNU make in Automake, Stefano Lattarini, 19:59
  • My drafts for Google Summer of Code applications, Stefano Lattarini, 19:56
  • Re: Do convenience libraries propagate -R linker flags?, Ralf Wildenhues, 18:36
• March 17, 2011
  • Re: aclocal only picking up /usr/local/share and not /usr/share, Peter Johansson, 18:30
  • Re: aclocal only picking up /usr/local/share and not /usr/share, Maynard Johnson, 18:06
  • Re: aclocal only picking up /usr/local/share and not /usr/share, Stefano Lattarini, 11:06
  • Re: aclocal only picking up /usr/local/share and not /usr/share, Maynard Johnson, 10:39
  • Re: aclocal only picking up /usr/local/share and not /usr/share, Stefano Lattarini, 06:17
• March 16, 2011
  • aclocal only picking up /usr/local/share and not /usr/share, Maynard Johnson, 22:07
  • Re: ACLOCAL_PATH patch?, Ralf Wildenhues, 01:22
• March 15, 2011
  • Re: ACLOCAL_PATH patch?, Harlan Stenn, 18:19
  • Re: ACLOCAL_PATH patch?, Stefano Lattarini, 17:37
  • ACLOCAL_PATH patch?, Harlan Stenn, 16:34
• March 14, 2011
  • Do convenience libraries propagate -R linker flags?, Rhys Ulerich, 12:36
• March 13, 2011
  • Re: PKG_CHECK_MODULES on system without pkg-config installed?, Jef Driesen, 05:35
  • Re: PKG_CHECK_MODULES on system without pkg-config installed?, Jef Driesen, 03:57
• March 11, 2011
  • Re: Mucking with ltmain.sh, Rhys Ulerich, 23:50
  • Re: Keep variable un-expanded in configure script, Too, Justin A., 19:11
  • Re: FW: Keep variable un-expanded in configure script, Ben Pfaff, 18:31
  • FW: Keep variable un-expanded in configure script, Too, Justin A., 17:06
  • Re: Mucking with ltmain.sh, Ralf Wildenhues, 15:27
  • Mucking with ltmain.sh, Rhys Ulerich, 15:03
  • Re: PKG_CHECK_MODULES on system without pkg-config installed?, Steffen Dettmer, 05:55
  • Re: PKG_CHECK_MODULES on system without pkg-config installed?, Baurzhan Ismagulov, 04:09
  • RE: PKG_CHECK_MODULES on system without pkg-config installed?, Xochitl Lunde, 04:09
  • Re: PKG_CHECK_MODULES on system without pkg-config installed?, Ralf Corsepius, 03:05
  • Re: PKG_CHECK_MODULES on system without pkg-config installed?, Daniel Herring, 01:34
  • Re: Automake GSoC idea, Ralf Wildenhues, 00:43
  • Re: PKG_CHECK_MODULES on system without pkg-config installed?, Ralf Wildenhues, 00:30
• March 10, 2011
  • Re: PKG_CHECK_MODULES on system without pkg-config installed?, Miles Bader, 18:06
  • Re: PKG_CHECK_MODULES on system without pkg-config installed?, Dave Hart, 17:44
  • Re: PKG_CHECK_MODULES on system without pkg-config installed?, Roger Leigh, 17:44
  • Re: PKG_CHECK_MODULES on system without pkg-config installed?, Dave Hart, 17:44
  • Re: PKG_CHECK_MODULES on system without pkg-config installed?, Jef Driesen, 14:42
  • RE: PKG_CHECK_MODULES on system without pkg-config installed?, Jef Driesen, 08:53
  • Re: PKG_CHECK_MODULES on system without pkg-config installed?, Miles Bader, 06:30
  • Re: PKG_CHECK_MODULES on system without pkg-config installed?, Vincent Torri, 05:38
  • Re: PKG_CHECK_MODULES on system without pkg-config installed?, Miles Bader, 05:26
  • RE: PKG_CHECK_MODULES on system without pkg-config installed?, Jef Driesen, 05:03
  • Re: Autotools GSoC ideas, olafBuddenhagen, 03:42
  • Re: PKG_CHECK_MODULES on system without pkg-config installed?, Miles Bader, 01:38
  • Re: PKG_CHECK_MODULES on system without pkg-config installed?, Jef Driesen, 00:59
• March 09, 2011
  • Re: Autotools GSoC ideas, Harlan Stenn, 21:19
  • Automake GSoC idea, Daniel Herring, 21:19
  • Re: Autotools GSoC ideas, Stefano Lattarini, 02:53
  • Re: Autotools GSoC ideas, Ralf Wildenhues, 00:24
• March 08, 2011
  • Re: Autotools GSoC ideas, Stefano Lattarini, 16:51
  • Re: Autotools GSoC ideas, Robert Collins, 16:30
  • Re: Autotools GSoC ideas, Stefano Lattarini, 14:39
  • Re: Autotools GSoC ideas, Ralf Wildenhues, 14:19
• March 07, 2011
  • Re: Autotools GSoC ideas, Robert Collins, 21:20
  • Re: Autotools GSoC ideas, Russ Allbery, 19:26
  • Re: Autotools GSoC ideas, Stefano Lattarini, 09:19
  • Autotools GSoC ideas, Ralf Wildenhues, 07:10
• March 06, 2011
  • Re: PKG_CHECK_MODULES on system without pkg-config installed?, Miles Bader, 19:55
  • Re: PKG_CHECK_MODULES on system without pkg-config installed?, Jef Driesen, 18:03
  • Re: PKG_CHECK_MODULES on system without pkg-config installed?, Jef Driesen, 08:09
• March 05, 2011
  • PKG_CHECK_MODULES on system without pkg-config installed?, Jef Driesen, 14:14
  • PKG_CHECK_MODULES on system without pkg-config installed?, Jef Driesen, 14:14
• March 04, 2011
  • [PATCH] {maint} tests: fix bug in alloca*.test (was: Re: alloca2 test), Stefano Lattarini, 20:03
  • alloca2 test, Patrick Welche, 15:14
• March 03, 2011
  • Re: macros directory not created automatically, Stefano Lattarini, 17:57
  • macros directory not created automatically, Javier Jardón, 12:55

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc