vile
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: macro question


From: Mike Mackovitch
Subject: Re: macro question
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 16:48:52 -0700

No need to mess with $cfilname.

I have a write-hook that saves numbered backups (file~#~, where # is 1, 2, 3, etc.) by
simply passing the filename to some code that makes a copy of the file using the
next unused number and preserving the mod time.

--mike

On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 2:46 PM Thomas Dickey <dickey@his.com> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 08:01:01PM +0000, david sowerby wrote:
> Hi, in Vim/Neovim I can save a copy of the file when I exit. The copy is renamed file-$(date +%s).bak. This gives me a file with an increasing number plus .bak. It looks like "date+%s" and  "&stime" do the same thing. Is this possible in vile? I know I can save a file as file.bak but I like to save a series of changed files, not just one.
> So a macro that saves a copy and I then call that macro with write-hook.  Thanks.

write-hook is called before a file is written (so I don't think it would work
just like the suggested order).

But you could have a macro which decides what the filename should be,
and writes to that.  The macro should save and restore $cfilname,
otherwise $cfilname will get updated to point to the most recently
written file.

--
Thomas E. Dickey <dickey@invisible-island.net>
https://invisible-island.net

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]