[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Staging for -m32 option
From: |
Henry Kroll |
Subject: |
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Staging for -m32 option |
Date: |
Tue, 07 Dec 2010 14:32:59 -0800 |
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 12:23 +0100, grischka wrote:
> Henry Kroll wrote:
> > _WIN64 is not handled (yet), so we only deal with the "Big 3"
> > cross-compiler configurations for now, the minimum needed to start
> > testing on Windows or Linux:
> >
> > 1) x86_64-win32-tcc.exe -> tcc.exe (win32 to Win64/32 only, for now)
> > 2) tcc -m32 -> i386-tcc (Linux64 to Linux64/32).
> > 3) x86_64-win32-tcc -m32 -> i386-win32-tcc (Linux64 to Win64/32).
>
> I'd argue that tinycc is free enough not to support build systems
> that put "x86_64-" and "-m32" on the same line.
>
> --- grischka
>
Arbitrary 64(x)->32(x) -m32 relay would be nice. I guess a naive way to
do it is to look first for i386*-tcc[.exe] and if it is not there, try
good old tcc[.exe]. Also, I should probably pass an argument to the
relay, so it will know it is a relay and not to attempt any further
relays...
- [Tinycc-devel] Staging for -m32 option, Henry Kroll, 2010/12/05
- RE: [Tinycc-devel] Staging for -m32 option, Christian Jullien, 2010/12/06
- RE: [Tinycc-devel] Staging for -m32 option, Henry Kroll, 2010/12/06
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Staging for -m32 option, grischka, 2010/12/06
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Staging for -m32 option, Henry Kroll, 2010/12/06
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Staging for -m32 option, grischka, 2010/12/06
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Staging for -m32 option, Henry Kroll, 2010/12/07
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Staging for -m32 option, grischka, 2010/12/07
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Staging for -m32 option,
Henry Kroll <=