[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: test result code was Re: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vssim
From: |
Joerg Wunsch |
Subject: |
Re: test result code was Re: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vssimulavrxx |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:28:19 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
As Weddington, Eric wrote:
(Timeframe for the transition from old simulavr to simulavrxx.)
> I would bet you a good German beer that it would take less time than
> that for the "legions" of old simulavr users to switch over. ;-)
I wonder where you'd get the good German beer from over in Colorado. :)
The big question mark is simply that you'll never know for sure in an
opensource project about how many active users might actually be out
there. I've sometimes be surprised by people approaching me in
private mail, when it turned out they've been using a particular
feature for years you'd never have guessed about, just because the
feature has once been there. Just remember how many years we've been
telling people that there was really no realistic reason for crying
after the death of the old sbi and cbi macros...
Stories like these make me a little cautious about dropping certain
backwards compatibility when it were actually easy enough to maintain.
--
cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx, (continued)
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx, Klaus Rudolph, 2009/03/11
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx, Joerg Wunsch, 2009/03/11
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx, Klaus Rudolph, 2009/03/11
- test result code was Re: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx, Joel Sherrill, 2009/03/11
- Re: test result code was Re: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx, Klaus Rudolph, 2009/03/11
- Re: test result code was Re: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx, Joel Sherrill, 2009/03/11
- Re: test result code was Re: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx, Klaus Rudolph, 2009/03/11
- Re: test result code was Re: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx, Joel Sherrill, 2009/03/11
- Re: test result code was Re: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx, Joerg Wunsch, 2009/03/11
- RE: test result code was Re: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vssimulavrxx, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/11
- Re: test result code was Re: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vssimulavrxx,
Joerg Wunsch <=
- RE: test result code was Re: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavrvssimulavrxx, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/11
- Re: test result code was Re: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx, Joel Sherrill, 2009/03/11
- RE: test result code was Re: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavrvs simulavrxx, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/11
- Re: test result code was Re: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx, Klaus Rudolph, 2009/03/11
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx, Joerg Wunsch, 2009/03/11
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx, Joel Sherrill, 2009/03/11
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx, Joerg Wunsch, 2009/03/11
- RE: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/11
- RE: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/11
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx, Klaus Rudolph, 2009/03/11