[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Version weirdness
From: |
EricZolf |
Subject: |
Re: Version weirdness |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Jan 2023 21:24:56 +0000 |
Hi,
it might make sense to check what 'pip list' tells you, once called as root,
once as normal user. Calling 'pip remove rdiff-backup' (without pressing y)
would even tell you where the files are. Also, calling 'hash -r' makes sure
that you're not using the wrong binary.
KR. Eric
On January 3, 2023 6:53:22 PM UTC, Alvin Starr via Any discussion of
rdiff-backup <rdiff-backup-users@nongnu.org> wrote:
>On 2023-01-03 13:49, Robert Nichols wrote:
>> On 1/3/23 11:44 AM, Robert Nichols wrote:
>>> I have one rdiff-backup installation for which "rdiff-backup --version"
>>> reports "rdiff-backup 2.2.0" and another which reports "rdiff-backup
>>> 2.2.2". The problem:
>>>
>>> 1. On both systems, "rpm -q rdiff-backup" reports
>>> "rdiff-backup-2.2.2-1.el8.x86_64".
>>> 2. On both systems, "rpm -V rdiff-backup" does not detect any changes
>>> in the installed files.
>>> 3. The md5sum checksums for all of the files listed by "rpm -ql
>>> rdiff-backup" match between systems.
>>> 4. Both systems are running Rocky Linux 8.7, fully updated.
>>>
>>> The system reporting "2.2.2" is a virtual machine. The one reporting
>>> "2.2.0" is a new installation running on the bare iron.
>>>
>>> If you have any idea about what might be happening, I'd like to hear about
>>> it. If you have no clue, welcome to the club.
>>
>> Ahh yes, I neglected to mention that on both systems "which rdiff-backup"
>> reports "/usr/bin/rdiff-backup", and explicitly running
>> "/usr/bin/rdiff-backup --version" reports the same as what I posted above.
>>
>Well if rdiff-backup --version responds with a result different from
>/usr/bin/rdiff-backup --version then there is another rdiff-backup installed
>somewhere.
>Check your bash aliases.
>