qemu-s390x
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v2 10/10] s390x/cpumodel: wire up 8561 and 8562


From: Christian Borntraeger
Subject: Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v2 10/10] s390x/cpumodel: wire up 8561 and 8562 as gen15 machines
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 13:36:27 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1


On 26.04.19 13:32, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 26.04.19 13:10, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> 8561 and 8562 will be gen15 machines. There is no name yet, lets us use
>> the cpu id as base name. Later on we can provide aliases with the proper
>> name.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  target/s390x/cpu_models.c | 2 ++
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu_models.c b/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
>> index d683635eb5..dd6415103f 100644
>> --- a/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
>> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
>> @@ -83,6 +83,8 @@ static S390CPUDef s390_cpu_defs[] = {
>>      CPUDEF_INIT(0x3906, 14, 1, 47, 0x08000000U, "z14", "IBM z14 GA1"),
>>      CPUDEF_INIT(0x3906, 14, 2, 47, 0x08000000U, "z14.2", "IBM z14 GA2"),
>>      CPUDEF_INIT(0x3907, 14, 1, 47, 0x08000000U, "z14ZR1", "IBM z14 Model 
>> ZR1 GA1"),
>> +    CPUDEF_INIT(0x8561, 15, 1, 47, 0x08000000U, "8561", "IBM 8561 GA1"),
>> +    CPUDEF_INIT(0x8562, 15, 1, 47, 0x08000000U, "8562", "IBM 8562 GA1"),
>>  };
> 
> Thinking out loud, I know that official names are not published yet.
> Looking at the recent history (z13, z14), my educated guess would be
> z15. I guess pretty much everybody would guess that.

Not sure about trademark aspects - especially if this really becomes z15. The 
smaller
machine has no real history (ZR1 vs. s vs BC). So I think I would rather have a 
correct
number than a partially correct name.

> 
> So I wonder if using "z15" and e.g. "z15ZR1" or "z15s" would be easier
> to have, although in the end maybe not correct (whatever names smart
> people are able to come up with, history told us that consistent naming
> does not seem to be one of the core strengths of CPU marketing people in
> general).
> 
> So if we need aliases either way, and z15 is easier to understand than
> "8561" for any user, what about going forward with that and introducing
> actual alias later on? We can tag the names to be inofficial.
> 
> CPUDEF_INIT(0x8561, 15, 1, 47, 0x08000000U, "z15", "Inofficial name for
> gen15 model 1 GA1 (8561)"),
> CPUDEF_INIT(0x8562, 15, 1, 47, 0x08000000U, "z15ZR1", "Inofficial name
> for gen15 model 2 GA1 (8562)"),
> 
> (please don't eat me alive)
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]