qemu-s390x
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 0/3] s390x: SIGP + IRQ preparations for TCG v


From: David Hildenbrand
Subject: Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 0/3] s390x: SIGP + IRQ preparations for TCG vector register support
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 11:26:02 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0

On 22.02.19 11:16, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 09:11:50 +0100
> David Hildenbrand <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> These are minor preparations for vector instruction support for TCG, also
>> touching KVM code.
>>
>> During SIGP STORE ADDITIONAL STATUS we have to properly convert the
>> endianess. On machine checks, we have to also store the vector registers
>> into the extended save area.
>>
>> Both changes are not used by TCG code before we implement + enable
>> vector instructions. KVM code shares the SIGP STORE ADDITIONAL STATUS
>> implementation.
>>
>> Note: Vector registers (128 bit) are modeled as two 64 bit values. Low and
>> high 64 bit values correspond on big/little systems, however the values
>> themself need conversion. Documentation for that will be added along with
>> the actual vector instruction support.
>>
>> David Hildenbrand (3):
>>   s390x: Use cpu_to_be64 in SIGP STORE ADDITIONAL STATUS
>>   s390x: use a QEMU-style typedef + name for SIGP save area struct
>>   s390x/tcg: Save vregs to extended mchk save area
>>
>>  target/s390x/excp_helper.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>  target/s390x/helper.c      | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
>>  target/s390x/internal.h    |  4 +++-
>>  3 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>
> 
> Quick question: Unlike your floating-point patch series, this does not
> depend on anything not going through the s390x tree, right?
> 

While these patches are based on the others, they should apply and work
just nicely without the floating-point patches.

-- 

Thanks,

David / dhildenb



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]