qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3] win32: set threads name


From: Richard Henderson
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] win32: set threads name
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2022 08:01:58 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0

On 10/7/22 02:52, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
Hi

On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 1:04 AM Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org <mailto:richard.henderson@linaro.org>> wrote:

    On 10/6/22 05:51, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
     > Hi Richard
     >
     > On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 11:39 AM Marc-André Lureau 
<marcandre.lureau@redhat.com
    <mailto:marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
     > <mailto:marcandre.lureau@redhat.com 
<mailto:marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>>> wrote:
     >
     >     Hi
     >
     >     On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 6:10 PM Richard Henderson
     >     <richard.henderson@linaro.org <mailto:richard.henderson@linaro.org>
    <mailto:richard.henderson@linaro.org 
<mailto:richard.henderson@linaro.org>>> wrote:
     >      >
     >      > On 9/30/22 07:03, marcandre.lureau@redhat.com
    <mailto:marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> <mailto:marcandre.lureau@redhat.com
    <mailto:marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>>
     >     wrote:
     >      > > +static bool
     >      > > +set_thread_description(HANDLE h, const char *name)
     >      > > +{
     >      > > +  HRESULT hr;
     >      > > +  g_autofree wchar_t *namew = NULL;
     >      > > +
     >      > > +  if (!load_set_thread_description()) {
     >      > > +      return false;
     >      > > +  }
     >      >
     >      > I don't understand why you're retaining this.
     >      > What is your logic?
     >      >
     >
     >     Also, if we change the "static bool name_threads" to be true by
     >     default, then set_thread_description() might be called without 
calling
     >     qemu_thread_naming()
     >
     >     It really shouldn't hurt to keep it that way.
     >
     >
     >
     > Let me know if the current form is ok for you, thanks

    I guess it's ok, sure.


Should I take that for an Ack?  :)

Yes, that was sloppy.
Acked-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>


r~



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]