qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v5 08/13] KVM: Use memfile_pfn_ops to obtain pfn for private


From: Chao Peng
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/13] KVM: Use memfile_pfn_ops to obtain pfn for private pages
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 20:37:51 +0800

On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 11:56:06PM +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2022, Chao Peng wrote:
> > @@ -2217,4 +2220,34 @@ static inline void kvm_handle_signal_exit(struct 
> > kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >  /* Max number of entries allowed for each kvm dirty ring */
> >  #define  KVM_DIRTY_RING_MAX_ENTRIES  65536
> >  
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMFILE_NOTIFIER
> > +static inline long kvm_memfile_get_pfn(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t 
> > gfn,
> > +                                  int *order)
> > +{
> > +   pgoff_t index = gfn - slot->base_gfn +
> > +                   (slot->private_offset >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> 
> This is broken for 32-bit kernels, where gfn_t is a 64-bit value but pgoff_t 
> is a
> 32-bit value.  There's no reason to support this for 32-bit kernels, so...
> 
> The easiest fix, and likely most maintainable for other code too, would be to
> add a dedicated CONFIG for private memory, and then have KVM check that for 
> all
> the memfile stuff.  x86 can then select it only for 64-bit kernels, and in 
> turn
> select MEMFILE_NOTIFIER iff private memory is supported.
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig
> index ca7b2a6a452a..ee9c8c155300 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig
> @@ -48,7 +48,9 @@ config KVM
>         select SRCU
>         select INTERVAL_TREE
>         select HAVE_KVM_PM_NOTIFIER if PM
> -       select MEMFILE_NOTIFIER
> +       select HAVE_KVM_PRIVATE_MEM if X86_64
> +       select MEMFILE_NOTIFIER if HAVE_KVM_PRIVATE_MEM
> +
>         help
>           Support hosting fully virtualized guest machines using hardware
>           virtualization extensions.  You will need a fairly recent
> 
> And in addition to replacing checks on CONFIG_MEMFILE_NOTIFIER, the probing of
> whether or not KVM_MEM_PRIVATE is allowed can be:
> 
> @@ -1499,23 +1499,19 @@ static void kvm_replace_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
>         }
>  }
> 
> -bool __weak kvm_arch_private_memory_supported(struct kvm *kvm)
> -{
> -       return false;
> -}
> -
>  static int check_memory_region_flags(struct kvm *kvm,
>                                 const struct kvm_userspace_memory_region *mem)
>  {
>         u32 valid_flags = KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES;
> 
> -       if (kvm_arch_private_memory_supported(kvm))
> -               valid_flags |= KVM_MEM_PRIVATE;
> -
>  #ifdef __KVM_HAVE_READONLY_MEM
>         valid_flags |= KVM_MEM_READONLY;
>  #endif
> 
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_HAVE_PRIVATE_MEM
> +       valid_flags |= KVM_MEM_PRIVATE;
> +#endif

One thing to mention is CONFIG_KVM_HAVE_PRIVATE_MEM is build-time thing.
Do you think we should or not do that for runtime? E.g. expose by vm_type
so only when TDX is enabled KVM_MEM_PRIVATE is exposed.

Chao



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]