qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] char-socket: Lock tcp_chr_disconnect() and


From: Daniel P . Berrangé
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] char-socket: Lock tcp_chr_disconnect() and socket_reconnect_timeout()
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 14:26:49 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)

On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 03:23:23PM +0200, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> There's a race condition in which the tcp_chr_read() ioc handler can
> close a connection that is being written to from another thread.
> 
> Running iotest 136 in a loop triggers this problem and crashes QEMU.
> 
>  (gdb) bt
>  #0  0x00005558b842902d in object_get_class (obj=0x0) at qom/object.c:860
>  #1  0x00005558b84f92db in qio_channel_writev_full (ioc=0x0, 
> iov=0x7ffc355decf0, niov=1, fds=0x0, nfds=0, errp=0x0) at io/channel.c:76
>  #2  0x00005558b84e0e9e in io_channel_send_full (ioc=0x0, buf=0x5558baf5beb0, 
> len=138, fds=0x0, nfds=0) at chardev/char-io.c:123
>  #3  0x00005558b84e4a69 in tcp_chr_write (chr=0x5558ba460380, 
> buf=0x5558baf5beb0 "...", len=138) at chardev/char-socket.c:135
>  #4  0x00005558b84dca55 in qemu_chr_write_buffer (s=0x5558ba460380, 
> buf=0x5558baf5beb0 "...", len=138, offset=0x7ffc355dedd0, write_all=false) at 
> chardev/char.c:112
>  #5  0x00005558b84dcbc2 in qemu_chr_write (s=0x5558ba460380, 
> buf=0x5558baf5beb0 "...", len=138, write_all=false) at chardev/char.c:147
>  #6  0x00005558b84dfb26 in qemu_chr_fe_write (be=0x5558ba476610, 
> buf=0x5558baf5beb0 "...", len=138) at chardev/char-fe.c:42
>  #7  0x00005558b8088c86 in monitor_flush_locked (mon=0x5558ba476610) at 
> monitor.c:406
>  #8  0x00005558b8088e8c in monitor_puts (mon=0x5558ba476610, 
> str=0x5558ba921e49 "") at monitor.c:449
>  #9  0x00005558b8089178 in qmp_send_response (mon=0x5558ba476610, 
> rsp=0x5558bb161600) at monitor.c:498
>  #10 0x00005558b808920c in monitor_qapi_event_emit 
> (event=QAPI_EVENT_SHUTDOWN, qdict=0x5558bb161600) at monitor.c:526
>  #11 0x00005558b8089307 in monitor_qapi_event_queue_no_reenter 
> (event=QAPI_EVENT_SHUTDOWN, qdict=0x5558bb161600) at monitor.c:551
>  #12 0x00005558b80896c0 in qapi_event_emit (event=QAPI_EVENT_SHUTDOWN, 
> qdict=0x5558bb161600) at monitor.c:626
>  #13 0x00005558b855f23b in qapi_event_send_shutdown (guest=false, 
> reason=SHUTDOWN_CAUSE_HOST_QMP_QUIT) at qapi/qapi-events-run-state.c:43
>  #14 0x00005558b81911ef in qemu_system_shutdown 
> (cause=SHUTDOWN_CAUSE_HOST_QMP_QUIT) at vl.c:1837
>  #15 0x00005558b8191308 in main_loop_should_exit () at vl.c:1885
>  #16 0x00005558b819140d in main_loop () at vl.c:1924
>  #17 0x00005558b8198c84 in main (argc=18, argv=0x7ffc355df3f8, 
> envp=0x7ffc355df490) at vl.c:4665
> 
> This patch adds a lock to protect tcp_chr_disconnect() and
> socket_reconnect_timeout()
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alberto Garcia <address@hidden>
> ---
>  chardev/char-socket.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/chardev/char-socket.c b/chardev/char-socket.c
> index eaa8e8b68f..5f421bdc58 100644
> --- a/chardev/char-socket.c
> +++ b/chardev/char-socket.c
> @@ -148,7 +148,9 @@ static int tcp_chr_write(Chardev *chr, const uint8_t 
> *buf, int len)
>  
>          if (ret < 0 && errno != EAGAIN) {
>              if (tcp_chr_read_poll(chr) <= 0) {
> +                qemu_mutex_unlock(&chr->chr_write_lock);
>                  tcp_chr_disconnect(chr);
> +                qemu_mutex_lock(&chr->chr_write_lock);
>                  return len;
>              } /* else let the read handler finish it properly */
>          }
> @@ -440,6 +442,13 @@ static void update_disconnected_filename(SocketChardev 
> *s)
>      }
>  }
>  
> +static gboolean tcp_chr_be_event_closed(gpointer opaque)
> +{
> +    Chardev *chr = opaque;
> +    qemu_chr_be_event(chr, CHR_EVENT_CLOSED);
> +    return FALSE;
> +}
> +
>  /* NB may be called even if tcp_chr_connect has not been
>   * reached, due to TLS or telnet initialization failure,
>   * so can *not* assume s->connected == true
> @@ -447,7 +456,10 @@ static void update_disconnected_filename(SocketChardev 
> *s)
>  static void tcp_chr_disconnect(Chardev *chr)
>  {
>      SocketChardev *s = SOCKET_CHARDEV(chr);
> -    bool emit_close = s->connected;
> +    bool emit_close;
> +
> +    qemu_mutex_lock(&chr->chr_write_lock);
> +    emit_close = s->connected;
>  
>      tcp_chr_free_connection(chr);
>  
> @@ -457,11 +469,12 @@ static void tcp_chr_disconnect(Chardev *chr)
>      }
>      update_disconnected_filename(s);
>      if (emit_close) {
> -        qemu_chr_be_event(chr, CHR_EVENT_CLOSED);
> +        qemu_idle_add(tcp_chr_be_event_closed, chr, chr->gcontext);

I'm a little concerned that this change might trigger some unexpected
interactions with the qemu_chr_wait_connected() function. I added some
more testing around that code, so if it passes the new tests I have in:

  https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-01/msg05962.html

and also works with the vhostuser reconnect device, then we are probably
ok.

Assuming it passes the test above:

  Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <address@hidden>


>      }
>      if (s->reconnect_time) {
>          qemu_chr_socket_restart_timer(chr);
>      }
> +    qemu_mutex_unlock(&chr->chr_write_lock);
>  }
>  
>  static gboolean tcp_chr_read(QIOChannel *chan, GIOCondition cond, void 
> *opaque)
> @@ -975,8 +988,10 @@ static gboolean socket_reconnect_timeout(gpointer opaque)
>      Chardev *chr = CHARDEV(opaque);
>      SocketChardev *s = SOCKET_CHARDEV(opaque);
>  
> +    qemu_mutex_lock(&chr->chr_write_lock);
>      g_source_unref(s->reconnect_timer);
>      s->reconnect_timer = NULL;
> +    qemu_mutex_unlock(&chr->chr_write_lock);
>  
>      if (chr->be_open) {
>          return false;

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]