qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/1] checkpatch: checker for comment block


From: Markus Armbruster
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/1] checkpatch: checker for comment block
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 17:11:03 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)

Peter Maydell <address@hidden> writes:

> On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 at 12:31, Markus Armbruster <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Peter Maydell <address@hidden> writes:
>> > On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 at 06:29, Markus Armbruster <address@hidden> wrote:
>> > I have to admit I never really understood what tweak
>> > you wanted making to the commit message. I'm happy
>> > to make it clearer: do you want to suggest a rewording?
>>
>> The commit message claims "(The only changes needed are that Linux's
>> checkpatch.pl WARN() function takes an extra argument that ours does
>> not.)"  This isn't the case.  You also dropped the kernel's "Networking
>> with an initial /*" special case.
>
> The bit of the commit message you didn't quote says
> "by backporting the relevant
> parts of the Linux kernel's checkpatch.pl. (The only changes
> needed are that Linux's checkpatch.pl WARN() function takes
> an extra argument that ours does not.)"
>
> The networking special case is not a "relevant part", which
> is why it's not in the patch. The bracketed statement applies
> to the code in the patch, not any lumps of code in the
> kernel's checkpatch that are not in the patch.

I understand you logic now.

> Anyway, I've adjusted the commit message as you suggest.
>
> Since we seem to now have consensus on the checkpatch patch,
> I'm going to put it into the "misc" pull request I'm putting
> together.

Thanks!



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]