qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 23/71] tests/libqos: arm/raspi2 machine node


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 23/71] tests/libqos: arm/raspi2 machine node
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 16:26:56 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.1

Hi Paolo,

On 12/3/18 4:32 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> From: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <address@hidden>
> 
> Add arm/raspi2 machine to the graph. This machine contains a generic-sdhci, so
> its constructor must take care of setting it properly when called.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
> ---
>  tests/Makefile.include            |  1 +
>  tests/libqos/arm-raspi2-machine.c | 91 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 92 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 tests/libqos/arm-raspi2-machine.c
> 
> diff --git a/tests/Makefile.include b/tests/Makefile.include
> index 66c7848..75951f8 100644
> --- a/tests/Makefile.include
> +++ b/tests/Makefile.include
> @@ -681,6 +681,7 @@ qos-test-obj-y += $(libqos-pc-obj-y)
>  qos-test-obj-y += tests/libqos/sdhci.o
>  
>  # Machines
> +qos-test-obj-y += tests/libqos/arm-raspi2-machine.o
>  qos-test-obj-y += tests/libqos/x86_64_pc-machine.o
>  
>  check-unit-y += tests/test-qgraph$(EXESUF)
> diff --git a/tests/libqos/arm-raspi2-machine.c 
> b/tests/libqos/arm-raspi2-machine.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..3aff670
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/libqos/arm-raspi2-machine.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
> +/*
> + * libqos driver framework
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2018 Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <address@hidden>
> + *
> + * This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
> + * License version 2 as published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
> + * Lesser General Public License for more details.
> + *
> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
> + * License along with this library; if not, see 
> <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>
> + */
> +
> +#include "qemu/osdep.h"
> +#include "libqtest.h"
> +#include "libqos/malloc.h"
> +#include "libqos/qgraph.h"
> +#include "sdhci.h"
> +
> +#define ARM_PAGE_SIZE             4096
> +#define RASPI2_RAM_ADDR           0
> +#define RASPI2_RAM_SIZE           0x20000000
> +
> +typedef struct QRaspi2Machine QRaspi2Machine;
> +
> +struct QRaspi2Machine {
> +    QOSGraphObject obj;
> +    QGuestAllocator alloc;
> +    QSDHCI_MemoryMapped sdhci;
> +};
> +
> +static void *raspi2_get_driver(void *object, const char *interface)
> +{
> +    QRaspi2Machine *machine = object;
> +    if (!g_strcmp0(interface, "memory")) {
> +        return &machine->alloc;
> +    }
> +
> +    fprintf(stderr, "%s not present in arm/raspi2\n", interface);

I'd cocci-replace fprintf(stderr) -> g_printerr()

> +    g_assert_not_reached();
> +}
> +
> +static QOSGraphObject *raspi2_get_device(void *obj, const char *device)
> +{
> +    QRaspi2Machine *machine = obj;
> +    if (!g_strcmp0(device, "generic-sdhci")) {
> +        return &machine->sdhci.obj;
> +    }
> +
> +    fprintf(stderr, "%s not present in arm/raspi2\n", device);
> +    g_assert_not_reached();
> +}
> +
> +static void raspi2_destructor(QOSGraphObject *obj)
> +{
> +    QRaspi2Machine *machine = (QRaspi2Machine *) obj;
> +    alloc_destroy(&machine->alloc);
> +}
> +
> +static void *qos_create_machine_arm_raspi2(QTestState *qts)
> +{
> +    QRaspi2Machine *machine = g_new0(QRaspi2Machine, 1);
> +
> +    alloc_init(&machine->alloc, 0,
> +               RASPI2_RAM_ADDR + (1 << 20),
> +               RASPI2_RAM_ADDR + RASPI2_RAM_SIZE,

This code is not obvious.

> +               ARM_PAGE_SIZE);
> +    machine->obj.get_device = raspi2_get_device;
> +    machine->obj.get_driver = raspi2_get_driver;
> +    machine->obj.destructor = raspi2_destructor;
> +    qos_init_sdhci_mm(&machine->sdhci, qts, 0x3f300000, &(QSDHCIProperties) {
> +        .version = 3,
> +        .baseclock = 52,
> +        .capab.sdma = false,
> +        .capab.reg = 0x052134b4
> +    });
> +    return &machine->obj;
> +}
> +
> +static void raspi2_register_nodes(void)
> +{
> +    qos_node_create_machine("arm/raspi2", qos_create_machine_arm_raspi2);
> +    qos_node_contains("arm/raspi2", "generic-sdhci", NULL);

Shouldn't we also register all the arm/ machines under the aarch64/
node? If we simply duplicate the same tests, then no.

> +}
> +
> +libqos_init(raspi2_register_nodes);
> 

We could generate this file from a YAML :)



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]