qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 2/2] tests/qtest/npcm7xx_emc-test: Connect all NICs to a back


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tests/qtest/npcm7xx_emc-test: Connect all NICs to a backend
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 08:33:52 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 06/02/2024 18.12, Peter Maydell wrote:
Currently QEMU will warn if there is a NIC on the board that
is not connected to a backend. By default the '-nic user' will
get used for all NICs, but if you manually connect a specific
NIC to a specific backend, then the other NICs on the board
have no backend and will be warned about:

qemu-system-arm: warning: nic npcm7xx-emc.1 has no peer
qemu-system-arm: warning: nic npcm-gmac.0 has no peer
qemu-system-arm: warning: nic npcm-gmac.1 has no peer

So suppress those warnings by manually connecting every NIC
on the board to some backend.

Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
---
  tests/qtest/npcm7xx_emc-test.c | 5 ++++-
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tests/qtest/npcm7xx_emc-test.c b/tests/qtest/npcm7xx_emc-test.c
index f7646fae2c9..63f6cadb5cc 100644
--- a/tests/qtest/npcm7xx_emc-test.c
+++ b/tests/qtest/npcm7xx_emc-test.c
@@ -228,7 +228,10 @@ static int *packet_test_init(int module_num, GString 
*cmd_line)
       * KISS and use -nic. The driver accepts 'emc0' and 'emc1' as aliases
       * in the 'model' field to specify the device to match.
       */
-    g_string_append_printf(cmd_line, " -nic socket,fd=%d,model=emc%d ",
+    g_string_append_printf(cmd_line, " -nic socket,fd=%d,model=emc%d "
+                           "-nic user,model=npcm7xx-emc "
+                           "-nic user,model=npcm-gmac "
+                           "-nic user,model=npcm-gmac",

Alternatively, use -nic hubport,hubid=0 in case we even want to run this test without slirp support, too (but currently there is already a check for this in the meson.build file, so -nic user should be fine, too). Anyway,

Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]