qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [PATCH V2 06/10] hw/acpi: Update GED _EVT method AML with cpu scan


From: Salil Mehta
Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 06/10] hw/acpi: Update GED _EVT method AML with cpu scan
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 12:13:16 +0000

> From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2023 12:54 PM
> To: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>
> Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; qemu-arm@nongnu.org; maz@kernel.org; jean-
> philippe@linaro.org; lpieralisi@kernel.org; peter.maydell@linaro.org;
> richard.henderson@linaro.org; imammedo@redhat.com; andrew.jones@linux.dev;
> david@redhat.com; philmd@linaro.org; eric.auger@redhat.com;
> oliver.upton@linux.dev; pbonzini@redhat.com; mst@redhat.com;
> will@kernel.org; gshan@redhat.com; rafael@kernel.org;
> alex.bennee@linaro.org; linux@armlinux.org.uk;
> darren@os.amperecomputing.com; ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com;
> vishnu@os.amperecomputing.com; karl.heubaum@oracle.com;
> miguel.luis@oracle.com; salil.mehta@opnsrc.net; zhukeqian
> <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>; wangxiongfeng (C) <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>;
> wangyanan (Y) <wangyanan55@huawei.com>; jiakernel2@gmail.com;
> maobibo@loongson.cn; lixianglai@loongson.cn; Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 06/10] hw/acpi: Update GED _EVT method AML with cpu
> scan
> 
> 
> > > aml_notify(aml_name(ACPI_POWER_BUTTON_DEVICE),
> > > > diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/cpu_hotplug.h
> > > b/include/hw/acpi/cpu_hotplug.h
> > > > index 48b291e45e..ef631750b4 100644
> > > > --- a/include/hw/acpi/cpu_hotplug.h
> > > > +++ b/include/hw/acpi/cpu_hotplug.h
> > > > @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@
> > > >  #include "hw/acpi/cpu.h"
> > > >
> > > >  #define ACPI_CPU_HOTPLUG_REG_LEN 12
> > > > +#define ACPI_CPU_SCAN_METHOD "CSCN"
> > >
> > > This seems to already be defined in hw/acpi/cpu.c
> > > Can we drop it from there given that file now includes this
> > > header anyway.
> >
> > Perhaps I can assign this to the macro in the hw/acpi/cpu.c?
> hw/acpi/cpu.c includes this header now anyway I think.
> So just drop that definition and should all be good.

Ok.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]