[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 0/3] GIC ITS tests
From: |
Andrew Jones |
Subject: |
Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 0/3] GIC ITS tests |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Nov 2021 15:54:42 +0100 |
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 02:08:01PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 11:47:31AM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Sorry this has been sitting in my tree so long. The changes are fairly
> >> minor from v2. I no longer split the tests up into TCG and KVM
> >> versions and instead just ensure that ERRATA_FORCE is always set when
> >> run under TCG.
> >>
> >> Alex Bennée (3):
> >> arm64: remove invalid check from its-trigger test
> >> arm64: enable its-migration tests for TCG
> >> arch-run: do not process ERRATA when running under TCG
> >>
> >> scripts/arch-run.bash | 4 +++-
> >> arm/gic.c | 16 ++++++----------
> >> arm/unittests.cfg | 3 ---
> >> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.30.2
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> kvmarm mailing list
> >> kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> >> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
> >
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > Thanks for this. I've applied to arm/queue, but I see that
> >
> > FAIL: gicv3: its-trigger: inv/invall: dev2/eventid=20 pending LPI is
> > received
> >
> > consistently fails for me. Is that expected? Does it work for you?
>
> doh - looks like I cocked up the merge conflict...
>
> Did it fail for TCG or for KVM (or both)?
Just TCG, which was why I was wondering if it was expected. I've never run
these tests with TCG before.
Thanks,
drew
Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 0/3] GIC ITS tests, Alex Bennée, 2021/11/12