[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mhbuild and long header fields
From: |
Philipp |
Subject: |
Re: mhbuild and long header fields |
Date: |
Fri, 01 Sep 2023 09:23:56 +0200 |
[2023-08-31 22:14] David Levine <levinedl@acm.org>
> Philipp wrote:
>
> > I have a version with charstring_t attached. I'm unsure if it's better
> > to only fold the body or include the field name. The version attached
> > only fold the body.
>
> RFC 5322 ยง2.2.3 only mentions folding the body. And field names
> can't have whitespace. So I think that only a body can be folded.
This was to vague asked by me. I was woundering about the API. Should
fold construct a string of the complete field or only the body.
Philipp
- Re: mhbuild and long header fields,
Philipp <=
- Re: mhbuild and long header fields, David Levine, 2023/09/01
- Re: mhbuild and long header fields, David Levine, 2023/09/16
- Re: mhbuild and long header fields, Philipp, 2023/09/17
- Re: mhbuild and long header fields, David Levine, 2023/09/17
- Re: mhbuild and long header fields, Philipp Takacs, 2023/09/17
- Re: mhbuild and long header fields, David Levine, 2023/09/17
- Re: mhbuild and long header fields, Philipp, 2023/09/18
- Re: mhbuild and long header fields, Andy Bradford, 2023/09/18
- Message not available
- Re: mhbuild and long header fields, David Levine, 2023/09/18