[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Problem with mhl.format
From: |
aalinovi |
Subject: |
Re: Problem with mhl.format |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Feb 2022 07:14:04 -0500 |
In message <20220215152817.3744F22192@orac.inputplus.co.uk>, Ralph Corderoy
writes:
>
>Picking on the simplest problem first, I'm not aware of this behaviour
>being per folder so I can't explain that unless the +inbox message
>doesn't have a x-spam-report field whereas the +nmh one does.
>
>With the current message in each folder set appropriately, what does
>this give?
>
> egrep -Him1 '^$|x-spam-report:' `mhpath +inbox .`
> anno -list -number -component x-spam-report +inbox .
>
> egrep -Him1 '^$|x-spam-report:' `mhpath +nmh .`
> anno -list -number -component x-spam-report +nmh .
>
Mr Corderoy - I replied to this message the day I received it. However,
since I do not see my cc in the mailing list I assume something went
wrong and you never got it.
As requested:
/home/slaurel$ folder +inbox
inbox+ has 17 messages (1-20); cur=2; (others).
/home/slaurel$ egrep -Him1 '^$|x-spam-report:' `mhpath +inbox .`
/home/slaurel/Mail/inbox/2:X-Spam-Report:
/home/slaurel$ anno -list -number -component x-spam-report +inbox .
1 malware * 0.0 TXREP TXREP: Score normalizing based on sender's
reputation
/home/slaurel$ folder +nmh
nmh+ has 118 messages (1-118); cur=118.
/home/slaurel$ egrep -Him1 '^$|x-spam-report:' `mhpath +nmh .`
/home/slaurel/Mail/nmh/118:X-Spam-Report:
/home/slaurel$ anno -list -number -component x-spam-report +nmh .
1 * -2.5 RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W RBL: Sender listed in HOSTKARMA-WHITE
* [209.51.188.17 listed in hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com] *
-0.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score:
0.0054] * 0.1 CK_NAIVER_NO_DNS At least one sender has no verified
rDNS * (postfix only) * 0.0 FORWARD_RELAY Appears to be
relayed through list or forwarding * 0.6 KAM_COUK Scoring .co.uk
emails higher due to poor registry * security. * -0.0
SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record * -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO
matches SPF record * 0.0 ENV_FROM_DIFF0 Envelope From differs
from from (eg list) * 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and
EnvelopeFrom 2nd level * mail domains are different * 0.1
CK_KARD_SIZE short, card virus size - avoid matches in long *
text * 0.0 CK_419SIZE typical 419 size - avoid matches in long text
* 0.0 KAM_DMARC_STATUS Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
* Alignment * -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description
available. * -0.1 AM_TRUNCATED Compensate on large message for
misfiring rules * -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply
a widely-seen list * manager * 0.1 TXREP TXREP: Score normalizing based
on sender's reputation
/home/slaurel$