[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug reported regarding Unicode handling in email address
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: Bug reported regarding Unicode handling in email address |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Jun 2021 10:39:03 +0100 |
Hi Tom,
> Anyway, interpreting the input as a Unicode code point, for values
> above U+7F (or, if you stretch it unreasonably, U+FF) is very clearly
> outside the spec.
I'm not sure it is. An unwise design choice by 4.4BSD, yes.
U+0081 as 0x81 is ‘is a character representable as an unsigned char’ for
it's a character, U+0081, and unsigned char holds [0, 0x100) so it
suffers no loss of representation as an unsigned char.
Though following that argument, every implementation should be doing it.
:-)
--
Cheers, Ralph.
Re: Bug reported regarding Unicode handling in email address, Valdis Klētnieks, 2021/06/02
- Re: Bug reported regarding Unicode handling in email address, Ken Hornstein, 2021/06/02
- Re: Bug reported regarding Unicode handling in email address, Bob Carragher, 2021/06/03
- Re: Bug reported regarding Unicode handling in email address, Ralph Corderoy, 2021/06/07
- Re: Bug reported regarding Unicode handling in email address, Ken Hornstein, 2021/06/07
- Re: Bug reported regarding Unicode handling in email address, Ralph Corderoy, 2021/06/10
- Re: Bug reported regarding Unicode handling in email address, Ken Hornstein, 2021/06/10
- Re: Bug reported regarding Unicode handling in email address, Ralph Corderoy, 2021/06/11
- Re: Bug reported regarding Unicode handling in email address, Ken Hornstein, 2021/06/11