[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: check if message is in a particular sequence?
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: check if message is in a particular sequence? |
Date: |
Sun, 02 May 2021 18:27:01 +0100 |
Hi Paul,
> it became clear that the range compression was an impediment. Now
> that I've added the ability to explicitly ask "is message 4 part of
> sequence foo", range compression isn't really an issue, but it feels
> like we should be able to control it. I'd kind of like to add
> -terse/-noterse:
-range/-norange. :-)
> (I'd also love to fix the old bug that causes "9 10" to be displayed as
> "9-10", but I probably shouldn't. Someone probably relies on it.)
I wasn't aware it was a bug, more an easy way to spot singletons;
messages without an adjacent neighbour in the sequence.
--
Cheers, Ralph.
- Re: check if message is in a particular sequence?, (continued)
- Re: check if message is in a particular sequence?, Paul Fox, 2021/05/02
- Re: check if message is in a particular sequence?, David Levine, 2021/05/02
- Re: check if message is in a particular sequence?, Ken Hornstein, 2021/05/02
- Re: check if message is in a particular sequence?, Conrad Hughes, 2021/05/02
- Re: check if message is in a particular sequence?, Laura Creighton, 2021/05/02
- Re: check if message is in a particular sequence?, Paul Fox, 2021/05/03
- Re: check if message is in a particular sequence?,
Ralph Corderoy <=
- Re: check if message is in a particular sequence?, Paul Fox, 2021/05/02
Re: check if message is in a particular sequence?, Bob Carragher, 2021/05/01
Re: check if message is in a particular sequence?, Ken Hornstein, 2021/05/01