[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [nmh-workers] closefds() _before_ fork?
From: |
Andy Bradford |
Subject: |
Re: [nmh-workers] closefds() _before_ fork? |
Date: |
23 Apr 2019 14:52:18 -0600 |
Thus said Paul Vixie on Tue, 23 Apr 2019 05:59:05 -0700:
> to that end, i propose that we treat any open descriptor N>2 at the
> time of an exec() to be a bug, which is to be fixed by setting
> O_CLOEXEC at time of creation.
What impact will such a decision have on tools like setlock which open a
filedescriptor, obtain an exclusive lock, and then exec a process? For
example, I may use something like the following in a script to prevent
multiple processes from incorporating email:
setlock /tmp/mit.lock inc +MyIncTmp ...
Thanks,
Andy
--
TAI64 timestamp: 400000005cbf7b26
- Re: [nmh-workers] closefds() _before_ fork?, (continued)
- Re: [nmh-workers] closefds() _before_ fork?, Ralph Corderoy, 2019/04/23
- Re: [nmh-workers] closefds() _before_ fork?, Paul Vixie, 2019/04/23
- Re: [nmh-workers] closefds() _before_ fork?, Ken Hornstein, 2019/04/23
- Re: [nmh-workers] closefds() _before_ fork?, Ralph Corderoy, 2019/04/23
- Re: [nmh-workers] closefds() _before_ fork?, Ken Hornstein, 2019/04/23
- Re: [nmh-workers] closefds() _before_ fork?, Tom Lane, 2019/04/23
- Re: [nmh-workers] closefds() _before_ fork?, Ken Hornstein, 2019/04/23
- Re: [nmh-workers] closefds() _before_ fork?,
Andy Bradford <=
- Re: [nmh-workers] closefds() _before_ fork?, Ken Hornstein, 2019/04/23
- Re: [nmh-workers] closefds() _before_ fork?, Andy Bradford, 2019/04/24
- Message not available
- Re: [nmh-workers] closefds() _before_ fork?, Ken Hornstein, 2019/04/25
- Re: [nmh-workers] closefds() _before_ fork?, Robert Elz, 2019/04/23
- Re: [nmh-workers] closefds() _before_ fork?, Ken Hornstein, 2019/04/23
- Re: [nmh-workers] closefds() _before_ fork?, Ralph Corderoy, 2019/04/23
- Re: [nmh-workers] closefds() _before_ fork?, Ken Hornstein, 2019/04/23
- Re: [nmh-workers] closefds() _before_ fork?, Ralph Corderoy, 2019/04/24