[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] GCC 8 pre-releases have escaped...
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] GCC 8 pre-releases have escaped... |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Feb 2018 17:46:55 +0000 |
Hi Ken,
> - Messages in IMAP are immutable, so if you overwrite ~/mail/inbox/42,
> in theory you should get a new UID for that message. But maybe our
> "internal" IMAP implementation wouldn't care.
So if the IMAP server noticed ~/mail/inbox/42 was different and started
calling it 314, 42 having gone, the user would be upset. So we'd need
some separate ID that the server carried with 42->314 so a layer of
indirection could exist in scan, etc.
> - AFAICT, pick(1) is implementable completely via the "vanilla" IMAP
> protocol, but if I'm wrong I'd be interested in knowing about it.
Well, if IMAP flings back the whole email then everything is
implementable. :-) But our own server could marry up with the needs of
the clients.
pick -thread '<address@hidden>' \
-dkim-valid -dkim-d '.*mail.com'
--
Cheers, Ralph.
https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy
- Re: [Nmh-workers] GCC 8 pre-releases have escaped..., (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] GCC 8 pre-releases have escaped..., Bakul Shah, 2018/02/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] GCC 8 pre-releases have escaped..., Ken Hornstein, 2018/02/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] GCC 8 pre-releases have escaped..., Ralph Corderoy, 2018/02/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] GCC 8 pre-releases have escaped..., Ken Hornstein, 2018/02/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] GCC 8 pre-releases have escaped..., Ralph Corderoy, 2018/02/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] GCC 8 pre-releases have escaped..., Ken Hornstein, 2018/02/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] GCC 8 pre-releases have escaped..., Paul Vixie, 2018/02/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] GCC 8 pre-releases have escaped..., Paul Vixie, 2018/02/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] GCC 8 pre-releases have escaped...,
Ralph Corderoy <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] GCC 8 pre-releases have escaped..., Bakul Shah, 2018/02/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] GCC 8 pre-releases have escaped..., Ralph Corderoy, 2018/02/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] GCC 8 pre-releases have escaped..., Paul Vixie, 2018/02/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] GCC 8 pre-releases have escaped..., Bakul Shah, 2018/02/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] GCC 8 pre-releases have escaped..., Ralph Corderoy, 2018/02/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] GCC 8 pre-releases have escaped..., Bakul Shah, 2018/02/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] GCC 8 pre-releases have escaped..., Ralph Corderoy, 2018/02/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] GCC 8 pre-releases have escaped..., Michael Richardson, 2018/02/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] GCC 8 pre-releases have escaped..., Ralph Corderoy, 2018/02/07