[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Oct 2017 19:26:41 -0400 |
>> imaptest -host cyrus.andrew.cmu.edu -sasl -saslmech anonymous -user nobody
>...
>> Connect time: 0.018900 sec
>
>For comparison, what's the `ping -c 10 $ip' statistics from your source
>address?
>
> min ms avg max mdev
> 128.2.158.29 120.570 123.153 128.260 2.133
> 128.2.105.45 120.830 136.279 249.528 37.794
> 128.2.158.26 116.089 133.622 180.430 20.598
Hah! I just knew you were going to try it, but across the pond it's
going to be much worse!
For 128.2.158.29, I get: 22.161/22.480/22.843/0.216 ms, and I imagine the
others are all close to that. Will be interesting to see what you get!
--Ken
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again, Ken Hornstein, 2017/10/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again, Michael Richardson, 2017/10/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again, Bakul Shah, 2017/10/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again, Robert Elz, 2017/10/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again, Bakul Shah, 2017/10/26
Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again, Ken Hornstein, 2017/10/26
Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/10/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again,
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/10/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again, Ken Hornstein, 2017/10/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again, valdis . kletnieks, 2017/10/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again, Ken Hornstein, 2017/10/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/10/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again, valdis . kletnieks, 2017/10/27
Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/10/27
Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again, Michael Richardson, 2017/10/26