[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] date math
From: |
Lyndon Nerenberg |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] date math |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:34:46 -0800 |
On Dec 15, 2014, at 9:23 AM, address@hidden wrote:
> Shouldn't that be the default?
I like it the way it is. I correspond with people all over the planet, and I
find it very helpful to know their local time when they send a message. It
provides a very strong hint as to whether I can expect a quick response if I
reply to them asking a question. E.g. if they sent the message at 1725 their
local time, it's a safe bet that any quick reply won't get read until the
following start of business - or say after 2100 their time for personal
correspondence.
--lyndon
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Robert Elz, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, hymie, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Robert Elz, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Paul Fox, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Bill Wohler, 2014/12/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, norm, 2014/12/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/12/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math,
Lyndon Nerenberg <=
Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/12/15
Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Ken Hornstein, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Paul Fox, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Ken Hornstein, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Robert Elz, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Ken Hornstein, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Ken Hornstein, 2014/12/15
Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Robert Elz, 2014/12/15
Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Ken Hornstein, 2014/12/15