[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1
From: |
Jerry Heyman |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1 |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Jul 2014 21:34:05 -0400 |
On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 17:49:23 -0700, Lyndon Nerenberg <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Jul 22, 2014, at 5:43 PM, address@hidden wrote:
>
>> Ok - then making the local variable 'i' unsigned would work, but that would
>> get into the middle of the flex generation.
>
> What is the filename and line number of this declaration of 'i'? I'm guessing
> this is in the .c output from the corresponding .l file? Sorry, but this
> isn't
> entirely clear to me from your description.
sbr/dtimep.c - generated from dtimep.l - line 2368
It's only a warning, and doesn't stop the compilation. The installation failed
because I built as non-root, and it tried to install in /usr/local.
>> address@hidden Downloads]$ rpm -qa | grep flex
>
> 'flex -V' please? What was built doesn't always match the package builder's
> idea of what was built :-)
address@hidden nmh]$ flex -V
flex 2.5.37
>
>> Linux unix.hobbeshollow.com 3.10.44-desktop-1.mga3 #1 SMP Tue Jun 17
>> 06:09:16 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> But what is the actual Linux distribution?
Mageia Linux (http://www.mageia.org)
> Release number?
Release 3
> Patch level? (I don't run Linux, so I can't derive that info from the
> kernel version stamps.)
Not sure how to relate to that question. RPMs are updated from the original
install as bugs/security holes are found. As far as I can tell, I'm patched
to the 'current' level - no outstanding patches available.
> --lyndon
jerry
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Ken Hornstein, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Jerry Heyman, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Bill Wohler, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, heymanj, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, heymanj, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1,
Jerry Heyman <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Ken Hornstein, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Bill Wohler, 2014/07/22
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, David Levine, 2014/07/22
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, David Levine, 2014/07/22
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, David Levine, 2014/07/22
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, David Levine, 2014/07/22
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, David Levine, 2014/07/23